This is excellent. If the social media companies are smart, they will cite the studies that show aluminum and mercury in vaccines - and vaccination - are harmful and cause dementia.
Never did flu shots for myself or my family, and when HPV shot was pushed on my three daughters, I said no and stopped taking them to annual doctor visits. Seems to me, anything "new" and/or "free" should be kept away with a 10-foot pole. I now regret not calling out doctors on what I experienced more than ten years ago. Lesson is if you see something wrong, act now, act right away, before it gets worse. - https://leemuller.substack.com/p/first-comes-gardasil-then-comes-covid
These companies have an interesting conundrum. If they try to focus the attention on aluminum in vaccines as the cause of anxiety in order to deflect blame from themselves, they will come up against a problem since they suppressed information on their platforms about aluminum in vaccines causing health issues such as this. Either way, they are to blame for increases in mental health issues in youth, because young people spend so much time on their platforms or because they suppressed information that could have prevented the children from being given products that cause mental health problems.
I thought pro-vaxxers insisted that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are in a chemical compound that does not separate so it is not like injecting pure aluminum.
Aluminum is a neurotoxicant. It is not biologically secreted. It does, however, destroy Zeta potential. And fluoride transports it over the blood-brain barrier.
Likely both the pharmaceutical companies and the tech companies have contributed to the mental health issues now faced by many youth. Good luck untangling which is more or less responsible. Giving a teen or pre-teen an iphone with full social media access is akin to handing them opiates. Many adults who were never vaccinated to the rate kids today are become addicted to these social media platforms. Those kids that were already experiencing poor mental health as a result of vaccination effects don't stand a chance. It is very sad, and the best thing that parents who have kids already 'vaxxed to the max' can do is not allow the phone/social media in the first place, after all there is a reason the creators of these devices do not allow their own children to use them!
There is a great documentary that explores the effect of these platforms on the brain that came out a few years ago now ( called 'The Social Dilemma' I think?) - well worth checking out if you have kids.
Why would Biden be pushing to “hold social media platforms to accountable for the national experiment they’re conducting on our children for profit” (this is a direct quote from the complaint document) when the exact same thing could be said for the covid injections? Is there an agenda?
“But Plaintiff needs a comprehensive, long-term plan and funding to drive a sustained reduction in the record rates of anxiety,depression, suicidal ideation, and other tragic indices of the mental health crisis its youth are experiencing at Defendants’ hands.”
It could be among the first steps in restricting access to social media, or the web. May need a verifiable id, be of a certain age, or have enough social credit points to access in the future. Remember, they started with mandatory injections in kids first, then they came for the adults.
Also, there is not much difference between what these tech companies do, & the history of the processed food industry, among others. They both design products to be as addictive as possible.
It may conveniently offered a deflection from genuine harms caused by over prescribing & over diagnosis of mental health conditions as clearly layed out in Peter Gotzsche’s Deadly Medicines & Organised Crime book.
There’s a good chance we are being played. Whilst I agree social media can definitely be harmful, in my opinion there are many other factors as well & this lawsuit may simply be a distraction & or have other motives.
The fact that neurotoxins are being injected repeatedly into our children is the best example we have of the banality of evil. Slowly but surely more parents are waking up to this.
Title: Antigenic sites in SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD show molecular similarity with pathogenic antigenic determinants and harbors peptides for vaccine development
"In current study, we performed an integrative approach to predict antigenic sites in SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain and found nine potential antigenic sites. The predicted antigenic sites were then assessed for possible molecular similarity with other known antigens in different organisms. Out of nine sites, seven sites showed molecular similarity with 54 antigenic determinants found in twelve pathogenic bacterial species (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium leprae, Bacillus anthracis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium tetani, Helicobacter Pylori, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Vibrio cholera and Yersinia pestis), two malarial parasites (Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi) and influenza virus A."
This is encouraging!!
Great analysis. Maybe the social media companies will think of this defense-I can dream, right?
Never did flu shots for myself or my family, and when HPV shot was pushed on my three daughters, I said no and stopped taking them to annual doctor visits. Seems to me, anything "new" and/or "free" should be kept away with a 10-foot pole. I now regret not calling out doctors on what I experienced more than ten years ago. Lesson is if you see something wrong, act now, act right away, before it gets worse. - https://leemuller.substack.com/p/first-comes-gardasil-then-comes-covid
Also, the importance of batch numbers and reporting adverse events - https://leemuller.substack.com/p/breaking-demand-autopsies-and-that
These companies have an interesting conundrum. If they try to focus the attention on aluminum in vaccines as the cause of anxiety in order to deflect blame from themselves, they will come up against a problem since they suppressed information on their platforms about aluminum in vaccines causing health issues such as this. Either way, they are to blame for increases in mental health issues in youth, because young people spend so much time on their platforms or because they suppressed information that could have prevented the children from being given products that cause mental health problems.
This is like suing the babysitter for molesting your children while still hiring and using the babysitter
Can Aluminum be chelated to then eject from body?
The can of worms was opened by governor Jay Inslee on Feb 29, 2020. I raise worms. Bad mistake Jay.
Great reading list. Speaking on Chris Dhaw, he and his colleagues had a nice show recently on CHD. https://open.spotify.com/episode/1FMaztDc3tdHVOT0GDRrb5?si=kx8Gi_-sR9Ke43rOS_dcPA&context=spotify%3Ashow%3A2kLEnDzpinQoT4innFSe1V
I thought pro-vaxxers insisted that aluminum adjuvants in vaccines are in a chemical compound that does not separate so it is not like injecting pure aluminum.
Aluminum is a neurotoxicant. It is not biologically secreted. It does, however, destroy Zeta potential. And fluoride transports it over the blood-brain barrier.
Likely both the pharmaceutical companies and the tech companies have contributed to the mental health issues now faced by many youth. Good luck untangling which is more or less responsible. Giving a teen or pre-teen an iphone with full social media access is akin to handing them opiates. Many adults who were never vaccinated to the rate kids today are become addicted to these social media platforms. Those kids that were already experiencing poor mental health as a result of vaccination effects don't stand a chance. It is very sad, and the best thing that parents who have kids already 'vaxxed to the max' can do is not allow the phone/social media in the first place, after all there is a reason the creators of these devices do not allow their own children to use them!
There is a great documentary that explores the effect of these platforms on the brain that came out a few years ago now ( called 'The Social Dilemma' I think?) - well worth checking out if you have kids.
Some thoughts:
Why would Biden be pushing to “hold social media platforms to accountable for the national experiment they’re conducting on our children for profit” (this is a direct quote from the complaint document) when the exact same thing could be said for the covid injections? Is there an agenda?
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wawd.317950/gov.uscourts.wawd.317950.1.0.pdf
“But Plaintiff needs a comprehensive, long-term plan and funding to drive a sustained reduction in the record rates of anxiety,depression, suicidal ideation, and other tragic indices of the mental health crisis its youth are experiencing at Defendants’ hands.”
It could be among the first steps in restricting access to social media, or the web. May need a verifiable id, be of a certain age, or have enough social credit points to access in the future. Remember, they started with mandatory injections in kids first, then they came for the adults.
Also, there is not much difference between what these tech companies do, & the history of the processed food industry, among others. They both design products to be as addictive as possible.
It may conveniently offered a deflection from genuine harms caused by over prescribing & over diagnosis of mental health conditions as clearly layed out in Peter Gotzsche’s Deadly Medicines & Organised Crime book.
There’s a good chance we are being played. Whilst I agree social media can definitely be harmful, in my opinion there are many other factors as well & this lawsuit may simply be a distraction & or have other motives.
The fact that neurotoxins are being injected repeatedly into our children is the best example we have of the banality of evil. Slowly but surely more parents are waking up to this.
Just looking at the symptoms of typhoid ... has anyone noticed that they are very similar indeed to so-called cov19?? Co-incidence? You think?
Title: Antigenic sites in SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD show molecular similarity with pathogenic antigenic determinants and harbors peptides for vaccine development
Dakal TC. Immunobiology. 2021 Sep;226(5):152091. DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2021.152091
"In current study, we performed an integrative approach to predict antigenic sites in SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain and found nine potential antigenic sites. The predicted antigenic sites were then assessed for possible molecular similarity with other known antigens in different organisms. Out of nine sites, seven sites showed molecular similarity with 54 antigenic determinants found in twelve pathogenic bacterial species (Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium leprae, Bacillus anthracis, Borrelia burgdorferi, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium tetani, Helicobacter Pylori, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Vibrio cholera and Yersinia pestis), two malarial parasites (Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium knowlesi) and influenza virus A."
This is an excellent article with tons of links, thank you.