31 Comments

And yet no person or group is holding the 'murderers' accountable.

Sorry, all the good talk and great articles you write just won't do it.

Expand full comment

We need to start somewhere. These articles are eroding the intellectual and science fraud foundations.

Expand full comment

and yet, better to write articles, to try to reach people, to try to reach a critical groundswell. would you have us do nothing?

Expand full comment

prosecutenow.com David Martin and large group of lawyers and docs

Tom Renz and large group of lawyers and docs

Expand full comment

this being said, friends, i hope you all are DOING SOMETHING TO FIGHT FOR TRUTH AND FREEDOM and not just reading and counting on a few good lawyers and docs. EVERYONE needs to get in this battle for minds and hearts and lives.

Expand full comment

But of course they would have to reach that conclusion, no matter how incongruous with the study outcome.

Expand full comment

The placebo wasn't saline, was it...

Expand full comment

Good question. What was the placebo? How many deaths would we expect in the control and study populations, given their demographic profile?

Expand full comment

Jessica Rose is looking into whether the placebo was saline or empty LNPs, which is more likely, especially as the placebo arm had deaths after the second shot, and that doesn't square with saline.

Expand full comment

Truly evil that they are STILL injecting this poison into adults & CHILDREN!?!

Also they are not talking about how much the shots are causing sterilization now & in our children’s future!?!

Expand full comment

Is there a way to test for this I wonder? My daughter was in last year of Masters Degree and took 3 shots (against my pleading with her not to) because she trusted…one of my sons took 3 shots because he very much feared. Pleaded with him too.🙏🙏🙏

Expand full comment

Need more proof of ADE and immune system erosion? An article published by The Center Square (Indiana) from a Scott Davison, CEO of OneAmerica (a life insurance company) is sounding the alarmhttps://www.thecentersquare.com/indiana/indiana-life-insurance-ceo-says-deaths-are-up-40-among-people-ages-18-64/article_71473b12-6b1e-11ec-8641-5b2c06725e2c.html over a 40% increase in total deaths among Americans aged 18 to 64 (i.e. working-aged Americans): “We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business – not just at OneAmerica,” the company’s CEO Scott Davison said during an online news conference this week. “The data is consistent across every player in that business. Davison said the increase in deaths represents “huge, huge numbers,” and that’s it’s not elderly people who are dying, but “primarily working-age people 18 to 64” who are the employees of companies that have group life insurance plans through OneAmerica. “And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic,” he said.

Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.” In fact, throughout 2021, people aged 18-49 passed away suddenly and unexpectedly, at rates far beyond years past. Almost every state reported a spike in prime age mortality during the year of the life-saving covid-19 vaccine, and prime age mortality SPIKED by 50% across multiple states during the year of the “life-saving” covid-19 vaccine. And next door in Illinois, January 2022, this headline: Illinois data: Deaths of people 18 to 49 soar in 2020-21; most of excess not COVID-related. https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/illinois-data-deaths-people-18-49-soar-2020-21-most-excess-not-covid

Ed Dowd, in Cause Unknown, adds “Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID. A 40 percent increase in deaths is literally earth-shaking. Even a 10 percent increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event. But this was 40 percent. The book begins with a close look at the actual human reality behind the statistics, and when you see the people who are represented by the dry term Excess Mortality, it’s difficult to accept so many unexpected sudden deaths of young athletes, known to be the healthiest among us. Similarly, when lots of healthy teenagers and young adults die in their sleep without obvious reason, collapse and die on a family outing, or fall down dead while playing sports, that all by itself raises an immediate public health concern. Or at least it used to.

Expand full comment

And by January, 2023, Japan began an official investigation into excess mRNA vaccine deaths. See https://www.technocracy.news/japan-launches-official-investigation-into-millions-of-mrna-vaccine-deaths/

Here are two professors speaking out (one, from, fittingly Hiroshima University, home of that other mass death event) on Twitter https://twitter.com/i/status/1607008929430769665 abd Prof. Shigetsoshi Sano from Kochi Univ. https://twitter.com/i/status/1607008954844078080 Says the article, “Prof. Shigetoshi Sano of the Kochi University School of Medicine discussed discovering spike proteins at the site of skin lesions (see the original research paper on synthetics spikes found in skin lesions here: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cia2.12278) and other skin problems on patients who were vaccinated. “The spike protein derived from the vaccine was found in the skin,” Sano explained, highlighting a slide showing a bright green region on a lesion made visible by a special dye. Spike proteins are locally suppressing the immune system,” Sano told reporters. “As a result, the spike proteins facilitate in reactivation of the herpesvirus.” The process of the spike proteins degrading in the immune system prompts inflammation throughout the body that also leads to blood clots, Sano concluded. “The function of the spike proteins to produce adverse reactions is formation of blood clots,” Sano explained. “And even worse, spike proteins can also locally induce inflammation.”

Agreeing that a suppressed immune system makes someone more vulnerable to infection, Sano went on to say, “I don’t know if I should say this, but it has been found that vaccinated people are more likely to get coronavirus than unvaccinated people.” “Sometimes, things that are not good are introduced into the human body. Vaccination may cause our overall immune system to fail to fight against such bad things,” he warned. The doctors’ investigations come as Kyoto University Prof. Emeritus Dr. Masanori Fukushima slammed Japan’s Ministry of Health for refusing to halt its Covid vaccination program, citing data showing a number of adverse reactions and deaths stemming from the jab.”

Is this suspicion of the vax “conspiracy theory” among 120 million Japanese too? And speaking of conspiracy theory, maybe people just don’t want to be lab rats in the government’s secret experiments, which as John Whitehead wrote, “which include MKULTRA and the U.S. military’s secret race-based testing of mustard gas on more than 60,000 enlisted men. https://www.npr.org/2015/06/22/415194765/u-s-troops-tested-by-race-in-secret-world-war-ii-chemical-experiments Indeed, you don’t have to dig very deep or go very back in the nation’s history to uncover numerous cases in which the government deliberately conducted secret experiments on an unsuspecting populace—citizens and noncitizens alike—making healthy people sick by spraying them with chemicals, injecting them with infectious diseases and exposing them to airborne toxins. Unfortunately, the public has become so easily distracted by the political spectacle out of Washington, DC, that they are altogether oblivious to the grisly experiments, barbaric behavior and inhumane conditions that have become synonymous with the U.S. government, which has meted out untold horrors against humans and animals alike

Expand full comment

So,

What is wrong with this study?

Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older Hui-Lee Wonga, Ellen Tworkoskib, Cindy Ke Zhoua, Mao Hub, Deborah Thompsona, Bradley Lufkinb, Rose Doa, Laurie Feinbergb, Yoganand Chillarigeb, Rositsa Dimovaa, Patricia C. Lloyda, Thomas MaCurdyb,c, Richard A. Forsheea, Jeffrey A. Kelma

Expand full comment

Methods: We evaluated 14 outcomes of interest following COVID-19 vaccination using the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data covering 30,712,101 elderly persons. The CMS data from December 11, 2020 through Jan 15, 2022 included 17,411,342 COVID-19 vaccinees who received a total of 34,639,937 doses. We conducted weekly sequential testing and generated rate ratios (RR) of observed outcome rates compared to historical (or expected) rates prior to COVID-19 vaccination. Findings: Four outcomes met the threshold for a statistical signal following BNT162b2 vaccination including pulmonary embolism (PE; RR = 1.54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; RR = 1.42), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; RR = 1.91), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP; RR = 1.44). After further evaluation, only the RR for PE still met the statistical threshold for a signal; however, the RRs for AMI, DIC, and ITP no longer did. No statistical signals were identified following vaccination with either the mRNA-1273 or Ad26 COV2.S vaccines.

Expand full comment

To be fair though, 14 vs 20 over 44k people is not a high number either way, it's not statistically relevant when the denominator is so much larger. The jab does not qualify for a bioweapon mass murder device based on this data, and the authors are not entirely wrong to assume an acceptable safety profile if the data is accurate and the study well executed (hmmm....).

However, if we accept their conclusions then it is also has to be true that the study does not show any statistical difference in all cause mortality, which if COVID19 was really that deadly, and the vaccine so awesome, then there would be a much higher death rate in the placebo group so the conclusion from their own findings has to be that vaccines don't work and did not / do not pass efficacy requirements for the EUA.

I call fraud on the lot of them.

Expand full comment

Remember there is a bias with selection of subjects for the trial. It isn't simply 20 vs. 14 deaths. All the people most likely to die from Covid or most likely to experience adverse vaccine reactions were eliminated. Very few elderly. No pregnant females (or pregnant males). Everyone had to be fairly young and healthy. That's why they didn't use Covid as the measurement of Covid. Instead they used Covid like symptoms as a proxy such as fever, coughing, nasal congestion. That's why they couldn't test for transmission. Transmitting what? A runny nose?

Altogether about 3500 participants were eliminated as the trial progressed. This number could have tipped the measurement of safety/efficacy either way.

If you have only healthy people in your trial, you can't expect to get a highly significant difference in death. Better to include lots of elderly people with diabetes, heart conditions, blood clotting disorders, obesity, COPD--all the common chronic conditions that cause death in our population. That will make the signal more noticeable!!!

Expand full comment

It is also evident how underpowered the study really was.

Likelihood of even contracting COVID in the PLACEBO group was 4/1000.

Making vaccine efficacy claims on a group of ~170 people that actually faced the virus is absurd. Especially when the SAE rate was about 20/1000, which is over five times higher the chance of contracting COVID in the placebo arm.

Let alone comparing severe covid to SAE rates.

Ludicrous this was allowed to pass for evidence proving safety and efficacy.

Expand full comment

2 percent chance of hospital or worse with who knows what happening long-term. I'd say this qualifies at least as a "mass weapon of harm" from the sponsors own data and should be stopped immediately.

The Thailand Myocarditis study shows how bad (only 1 aspect of) this thing is from data that is not provided by the company that stands to make a ton of money off the drug in question.

Expand full comment

I need another statistic in order to red pill my friends belonging to the church Our Lady of Perpetual Boosters. All cause mortality means nothing to them. They claim to be focused only in risk/benefit from Covid. They KNOW the risk of adverse events (especially death) is close to zero because the CDC early on reported they investigated all the VAERS deaths--and determined NONE of these deaths was due to the vaccine.

Also any deaths from heart attacks, strokes, pneumonia, etc. are meaningless. Only Covid deaths count. Just as their body's immune system becomes specialized to deal ONLY with Covid infections, their brain's risk assessment system, at the same time, becomes over specialized to deal ONLY with Covid risks. All risk comes only from Covid.

All cause mortality can be ignored. Of course more people will be dying since the vaccines rolled out. All excess deaths are due to Covid. We know that. There are no deaths from the vaccine. There can't be any because Pfizer and the CDC told us so.

Look you/we are not a credible source. Statistics can lie. There's so many of them anyway you just have to go with your gut. The FDA SAID so when they authorized vaccines for children--even though they had no proof of efficacy or safety. COVID is so dangerous and we so desperately need a vaccine.

Remember the first commandment of Our Lady of Perpetual Booster states: "Thou shalt have only ONE CURE/ONE TREATMENT. And that treatment shall be mRNA vaccines." And the FDA ruled that testing for safety/efficacy is no longer necessary because our faith shall protect us.

And all other treatments must be banned. And anyone who uses such treatments should be removed/censored and (if a medical professional) lose their license. California recently showed the way when their Governor signed a bill causing doctors to lose their license if they tried to criticize or discourage mRNA vaccines.

And every 90 days the government must renew the state of emergency to justify vaccine EUA (to avoid liability) and lockdowns and masking which we know to be effective. Our faith cannot be challenged because our authorities are all powerful and have God on their side. (Because Governor Hochul from NY told us so when she argued vaccines were from God)

And the second commandment is "Honor thy consensus medical professionals and follow the science, lest thou be excommunicated and no longer supported by the consensus." NOTE: If you don't trust the consensus medical professionals, you may die because all your medical treatment will either become instantly ineffective or unavailable to you.

Also because the risk of dying from Covid for elderly people is VERY HIGH (maybe as high as 20% for hospitalized patients following the consensus protocol mandating Remdesivir and intubation), we really need to mandate vaccines to save the elderly.

Remember to save ONE person from dying from Covid WE MUST VACCINATE. All other deaths are irrelevant. And unless 95% or more of people drop dead right after vaccination, we can ignore the risk of adverse vaccine events because CDC told us so.

Expand full comment

In fact, in July, 2022, Dr. Peter McCullough reported, (29 min https://www.bitchute.com/video/0qc4FQqbnaJQ/ ) that in fact a study out of Lund Univ., Malmo, Sweden confirms the reverse transcription is a fact, and the shot installs DNA into the human genome. Technocracy News reported on this here, noting “A new Swedish study published in MDPI found that the Pfizer vaccine goes into liver cells and converts to DNA, challenging claims so far that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way. It’s the first time that researchers have shown in vitro – or inside a petri dish – how an mRNA vaccine is converted into DNA on a human liver cell line, the Epoch Times reported. It’s precisely what health experts and fact-checkers said for more than a year could not occur.

Dr. Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist and epidemiologist who is one of the leading critics of the COVID vaccines, said the findings have “enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change” that could drive a “whole new genre of chronic disease.”The CDC assures Americans that the mRNA and the spike protein it produces in COVID-19 vaccines to create an immune response “don’t last long in the body.” On its website, the agency states: “Our cells break down mRNA and get rid of it within a few days after vaccination. Scientists estimate that the spike protein, like other proteins our bodies create, may stay in the body up to a few weeks.”Further, the CDC says on a web page titled “Myths and Facts about COVID-19 Vaccines” that the “genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells.” But in fact, the Lund University study shows the mRNA shot does enter human liver cells and triggers the cell’s DNA in the nucleus to increase the production of the LINE-1 gene expression to make mRNA. The whole process occurred rapidly, within six hours, concluded the study, which was published by the university’s Department of Clinical Sciences. Another story in Technocracy News on this here. https://www.technocracy.news/bombshell-pfizers-covid-mrna-shot-goes-into-liver-converts-to-dna/

Is the Lund University correct? Well, here’s a scientist at a WEF meeting admitting mRNA technology is being used to “correct mutations.” https://www.brighteon.com/0c2a6e00-066a-4fc8-bb1d-207466a7da58

Worse, as Steve Kirsch asks “how we can be assured that the mRNA sequence is intact at the time of injection when the FDA whistleblower at the Johnson committee admitted there is no quality control? This was a well-known problem before the vaccine was approved (the European regulator complained about it), but there was NEVER ANY EVIDENCE they FIXED the problem. If there is evidence, where is it? Without 100% mRNA integrity, the vaccine can’t work, right? How do you know? The drug companies haven’t done any studies and they PROHIBIT anyone from doing these studies. If it is safe and effective, why the prohibition on research studies? Heck, we don’t even know if the mRNA sequence being delivered is the same as what was in the trials.”

Expand full comment

A depopulation shot? I think so. But so-called negative eugenicists even took things further, with some, like famed playwright George Bernard Shaw, calling for people to be called before a state-appointed board to justify their existence or be put to death.”

The human response to this? Burgess Meredith put it simply in this 8 minute Twilight Zone episode, where Rod Serling notes in the world of what is today the WEF, “logic is an enemy and truth is a menace.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOYYCkVazBI

Expand full comment

I highly doubt the placebo was saline. Just look into how they test past vaccines.....there’s your clue!

Expand full comment

Yes, they usually test against another vaxxxx, not saline!

Expand full comment

my two friends who volunteered in the moderna trials were only followed for 2 months before the studies were unblinded and the control group was offered the vaccine. the husband who was in the treatment arm and so got both doses of moderna went out as soon as he was able and got the two shot primary pfizer series. the wife who was in the unblinded control group has had delta and omicron now

Expand full comment

This bugs me as i am only after the truth

It was 15 : 14 when the EUA was granted...... Then the placebo group was offered the vaccine

Most took it. THEN the extra deaths happened.

Thus we cannot really claim that the final result is 20 : 14 as the vaccine group was much larger.

Please show me where i am wrong if i am...............

Expand full comment

The 20 had a longer time with the stuff in them.

Nonetheless, it is a signal that it is not helping people survive longer DURING a "killer" pandemic. Deserves follow-up and caution, not coercing the population to take it.

Expand full comment

The reason they jabbed the control group? Get rid of the control group so it didn’t bite them if future problems came up.

The reason they tried to force every single human on the planet to get jabbed? Same reason.

Expand full comment

Is there any revelation that might break into the WEF controlled mainstream?

Expand full comment