A Rebuttal to Rosenbaum & Hughes: Clinging to a Tradition of Low-To-No-Evidence is not a good look for StatNews. You will want to share this article. The easy days at ACIP are over.
STAT seems to be a propaganda entity of the worst kind. Studying the Wiki and following the history, these people are not scientists but lobbyists... Big time.... Go get 'em Jack.
COVID-19 Replicon samRNA Injections Caused Severe Blood Abnormalities in 93% of Trial Participants
Despite major safety signals, the FDA, BARDA, Gates Foundation, and Arcturus Therapeutics continue to fast-track this experimental platform for mass deployment.
Pfizer experimented on millions of human beings with 12 vaccine candidates, including self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA), which is highly infectious through shedding.
Karen Kingston
Jun 3
June 3, 2025: We all remember being told that Pfizer’s COVID-19 spike-protein encoded mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP) injections;
enter cells at the injection site,
reprogram the cells to temporarily produce the spike protein,
antibodies neutralize the spike protein at the injection site,
the mRNA would degrade in a few days, and
that the LNPs were just ‘fats, including cholesterol.’
We now know that all of these statements were lies.
Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Have the Same Scientific Features and Clinical Outcomes as Self-Amplifying mRNA (saRNA)
Self-amplifying mRNA (sa-mRNA) is part of the flagship US government’s dual-use mRNA lipid nanoparticle technology portfolio used to create bioweapons ranging from SARS-CoV-2 to H15N1 and 'mRNA vaccines.'
The COVID-19 mRNA is fortified with pseudouridine, encapsulated in advanced gene-editing nanotechnologies (not basic lipids) that remain in the cells of the body and produce spike proteins for up to months and even years at a time. The mRNA shots cause shedding and new disease-causing ‘variants of concern’ that can infect others. Pfizer’s ‘mRNA’ mimics the same scientific features and clinical outcomes as sa-mRNA because it is sa-RNA
The devastating clinical effects and public health outcomes of Pfizer’s (and Moderna’s) COVID-19 ‘mRNA injections’ mimic those of self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA) injections, because saRNA was used in the shots.
Pfizer’s government submitted documents confirm that self-amplifying RNA (sa-mRNA) was used in the COVID-19 clinical trials and under emergency use.
I'm glad to see a good rebuttal of Rosenbaum and Hughes. However...
(1) This rebuttal needs a good going-over by an editor. There are grammatical glitches here and there, and the article ends abruptly with a sentence that appears to be missing its last half.
(2) Who's the man in the meme yelling "Show me the data!!!" ? My first take was that it was an AI-generated (fake) photo of RFK Jr. -- which showed him considerably younger than he is now, and out of character (I've never seen RFK Jr. yell or clench his fist...and even if he's done that in the past, he hasn't done it publicly when talking about vaccines and vaccine policy recently). Maybe it's an old photo of RFK Jr. (still out of character)? Or is it someone else? Whoever it is, I recommend removing it from the article; it detracts from the "message" rather than enhancing it.
Just perform truly scientific studies that can be repeated and verified again and again with data that is collected and reported honestly without bias. Medicine should become the quest for cures, not an exercise in best treating symptoms for profit and repeat sales.
Thank you for this ... The narrative is full of lies .. There should be more public discussion that Covid was treatable all along. That destroys the argument about high risk / older people needing more shots - which will of course make them sicker.
But it's true that Covid can be a nasty beast, and high risk people shouldn't face Covid without pharmaceutical help. And the sane version of pharmaceutical help would be to have a just in case kit with repurposed medicines and supplements, and no shots At All.
The pain I was in during my first Covid was excruciating. It only lasted one terrible night - the next day I still felt sick but not in terrible pain. Likely thanks to Ivermectin, HCQ, and the annoying, exhausting, but so grateful for it guidance of the FLCCC about things to stick up my nose, etc, etc.
It's a fair argument that people in poor health or elderly are at higher risk for bad Covid outcomes. But it's backwards to pretend that what they need in that situation is more immune-compromising, cancer promoting injections. What they need is preparation with early treatment ...
There's probably so much Kennedy wants to say that he's blocked from saying. I know he had to promise Senator Cassidy so many things to get his confirmation vote.
I don't think it's Kennedy's intent - I'm sure it's not - to be culling the weakest, yet that's what happens by saying high risk people need these shots.
What a mess ... It was known since 2005 that Sars One was treatable with HCQ ...
And the discussion of early treatment can meet people where they're at who take Covid seriously ... And it can tear the false narrative to shreds ...
STAT seems to be a propaganda entity of the worst kind. Studying the Wiki and following the history, these people are not scientists but lobbyists... Big time.... Go get 'em Jack.
COVID-19 Replicon samRNA Injections Caused Severe Blood Abnormalities in 93% of Trial Participants
Despite major safety signals, the FDA, BARDA, Gates Foundation, and Arcturus Therapeutics continue to fast-track this experimental platform for mass deployment.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Pfizer's Documents Confirm COVID-19 Shots Contained Self-Amplifying mRNA!
Pfizer experimented on millions of human beings with 12 vaccine candidates, including self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA), which is highly infectious through shedding.
Karen Kingston
Jun 3
June 3, 2025: We all remember being told that Pfizer’s COVID-19 spike-protein encoded mRNA lipid nanoparticle (LNP) injections;
enter cells at the injection site,
reprogram the cells to temporarily produce the spike protein,
antibodies neutralize the spike protein at the injection site,
the mRNA would degrade in a few days, and
that the LNPs were just ‘fats, including cholesterol.’
We now know that all of these statements were lies.
Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Have the Same Scientific Features and Clinical Outcomes as Self-Amplifying mRNA (saRNA)
Self-amplifying mRNA (sa-mRNA) is part of the flagship US government’s dual-use mRNA lipid nanoparticle technology portfolio used to create bioweapons ranging from SARS-CoV-2 to H15N1 and 'mRNA vaccines.'
The COVID-19 mRNA is fortified with pseudouridine, encapsulated in advanced gene-editing nanotechnologies (not basic lipids) that remain in the cells of the body and produce spike proteins for up to months and even years at a time. The mRNA shots cause shedding and new disease-causing ‘variants of concern’ that can infect others. Pfizer’s ‘mRNA’ mimics the same scientific features and clinical outcomes as sa-mRNA because it is sa-RNA
The devastating clinical effects and public health outcomes of Pfizer’s (and Moderna’s) COVID-19 ‘mRNA injections’ mimic those of self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA) injections, because saRNA was used in the shots.
Pfizer’s government submitted documents confirm that self-amplifying RNA (sa-mRNA) was used in the COVID-19 clinical trials and under emergency use.
I'm glad to see a good rebuttal of Rosenbaum and Hughes. However...
(1) This rebuttal needs a good going-over by an editor. There are grammatical glitches here and there, and the article ends abruptly with a sentence that appears to be missing its last half.
(2) Who's the man in the meme yelling "Show me the data!!!" ? My first take was that it was an AI-generated (fake) photo of RFK Jr. -- which showed him considerably younger than he is now, and out of character (I've never seen RFK Jr. yell or clench his fist...and even if he's done that in the past, he hasn't done it publicly when talking about vaccines and vaccine policy recently). Maybe it's an old photo of RFK Jr. (still out of character)? Or is it someone else? Whoever it is, I recommend removing it from the article; it detracts from the "message" rather than enhancing it.
Just perform truly scientific studies that can be repeated and verified again and again with data that is collected and reported honestly without bias. Medicine should become the quest for cures, not an exercise in best treating symptoms for profit and repeat sales.
Thank you for this ... The narrative is full of lies .. There should be more public discussion that Covid was treatable all along. That destroys the argument about high risk / older people needing more shots - which will of course make them sicker.
But it's true that Covid can be a nasty beast, and high risk people shouldn't face Covid without pharmaceutical help. And the sane version of pharmaceutical help would be to have a just in case kit with repurposed medicines and supplements, and no shots At All.
The pain I was in during my first Covid was excruciating. It only lasted one terrible night - the next day I still felt sick but not in terrible pain. Likely thanks to Ivermectin, HCQ, and the annoying, exhausting, but so grateful for it guidance of the FLCCC about things to stick up my nose, etc, etc.
It's a fair argument that people in poor health or elderly are at higher risk for bad Covid outcomes. But it's backwards to pretend that what they need in that situation is more immune-compromising, cancer promoting injections. What they need is preparation with early treatment ...
There's probably so much Kennedy wants to say that he's blocked from saying. I know he had to promise Senator Cassidy so many things to get his confirmation vote.
I don't think it's Kennedy's intent - I'm sure it's not - to be culling the weakest, yet that's what happens by saying high risk people need these shots.
What a mess ... It was known since 2005 that Sars One was treatable with HCQ ...
And the discussion of early treatment can meet people where they're at who take Covid seriously ... And it can tear the false narrative to shreds ...
https://www.epidemicoffraud.com/