Regulatory Irregularities Re: COVID-19 Vaccination Review and Approval

Shortcuts. Wrong Agencies. Self-Oversight. Ignoring evidence of harm. Ignoring evidence of low efficacy. Publication by Press Release. The List of Irregularities is Stunning. History Will Remember.

Our collective tracking and reporting of every move by Moderna, Pfizer, J&J, FDA, CDC, ACIP, VRBAC, Fauci and the tiniest minority of Americans in charge has been thorough and pervasive.

We know what they did every step of the way.

From trying to skip animal studies, to using the WRONG type of animals, to not measuring the right cytokines to detect disease enhancement, to word use designed to mislead the public on safety and efficacy, to miscalculations of efficacy, to missing data on efficacy, the specific moves are all chronicled.

Now the focus is on the question: Are the regulatory and government science agencies working within their Congressionally approved charters?

Why is CDC conducting science, that’s the NIH’s job?

Did FDA give due consideration to the accumulating evidence of risk of vaccination?

Why did FDA give approval to non-extant vaccine that is identical to and experimental vaccine in every way?

Why, and on what grounds, did CDC overrule FDA on boosters? Why did CDC’s endorsement set policy over FDA’s position?

Why is FDA and CDC ignoring the mounting evidence of negative efficacy?

Are there any circumstances under what conditions would FDA pull the vaccine EUAs?

Why are the vaccine companies and regulatory agencies targeting children when there is no benefit and it’s all risk?

For the last one, I refer you to Steve Kirsch’s interview of Children Health Defense’s Board Member Alix Meyer (President of CA Chapter of CHD).