"That's not how we do trials. We test for transmission AFTER the roll-out" should have been immediately followed by reference to that data.
Also, "That's not how we do trials. We test for transmission AFTER the roll-out" should have been immediately followed by a collective "Wait! What?" from the public.
If they're lying to you in this case, what makes you think they were telling the truth in any of the previous cases?
I hope that chips away even more at the reputations of government agencies and public health.
NO shocker, this - but, there's now (MORE) irrefutable proof / corroborating patents that what has sickened SO many of us (literally AND figuratively) is NOT mostly organic, or even a 'virus' - again, WHATever that ACTUALLY is (which JLW does KNOW has been MY area of focus for a half-decade and leaves me assuming a MIDDLE philosophical ground BETWEEN you, Kirsch and Tom, Stefan, Andrew inquiring as I do about their WHOLE biological role - as I've suggested of late, POSSIBLY originating as dysregulated enzymes; medially-INHERENT piezoelectrically-disruptive considerations can be nothing BUT critical ones, especially when CERTAIN countries have advanced their offensive military options BY them through ASSOCIATED 'proteonics' and similarly-efficacious WIDEscale expansion of wireless infrastructure). Nope; RATHER, synthetically-fabricated transgenic nanotechnological PARASITES (then, WHY precisely both Ivermectin & hydroxychloroquine - among OTHER anti-parasitics, ARE so useful; Fauci DID broadcast the introduction OF as much 3 years ago come December 4th) such AS Charles River Analytics propagated at DoD's behest and with MIT/RE's, Harvard's convicted Lieber / Gates Foundation illicit aid, black-budget 'dark' money.....
This was my very first thought.
"That's not how we do trials. We test for transmission AFTER the roll-out" should have been immediately followed by reference to that data.
Also, "That's not how we do trials. We test for transmission AFTER the roll-out" should have been immediately followed by a collective "Wait! What?" from the public.
If they're lying to you in this case, what makes you think they were telling the truth in any of the previous cases?
I hope that chips away even more at the reputations of government agencies and public health.
NO shocker, this - but, there's now (MORE) irrefutable proof / corroborating patents that what has sickened SO many of us (literally AND figuratively) is NOT mostly organic, or even a 'virus' - again, WHATever that ACTUALLY is (which JLW does KNOW has been MY area of focus for a half-decade and leaves me assuming a MIDDLE philosophical ground BETWEEN you, Kirsch and Tom, Stefan, Andrew inquiring as I do about their WHOLE biological role - as I've suggested of late, POSSIBLY originating as dysregulated enzymes; medially-INHERENT piezoelectrically-disruptive considerations can be nothing BUT critical ones, especially when CERTAIN countries have advanced their offensive military options BY them through ASSOCIATED 'proteonics' and similarly-efficacious WIDEscale expansion of wireless infrastructure). Nope; RATHER, synthetically-fabricated transgenic nanotechnological PARASITES (then, WHY precisely both Ivermectin & hydroxychloroquine - among OTHER anti-parasitics, ARE so useful; Fauci DID broadcast the introduction OF as much 3 years ago come December 4th) such AS Charles River Analytics propagated at DoD's behest and with MIT/RE's, Harvard's convicted Lieber / Gates Foundation illicit aid, black-budget 'dark' money.....