Covid Virus or No Covid Virus?
The theory advanced by Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman that viruses don’t exist (and by extension the COVID virus) has generated a lot of controversy. There are those who are convinced by their arguments and those that find the theory ridiculous. The path I advocate is taking is critical thinking and an examination of the evidence…
My God you're confused. "The theory advanced by Dr. Cowan and Dr. Kaufman that viruses don’t exist..." We don't have a theory, we are refuting a hypothesis that has never even been tested with valid controlled experiments. Virologists don't even get to the stage of finding and purifying an alleged virus from the bodily fluid/tissue of an alleged "host" to use as an independent variable in any controlled experiment (JLW: try telling me again that I don't understand what an independent variable is? lol).
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (211 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
Do virologists perform valid control experiments? Is virology a science?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
Hi James,
Love your level headed assessments of our situation. I’d like to ask you some questions regarding the virus real or not question. I remember in my microbiology class talking about the controversy between terrain and bug as far as causation. We were taught that there was a microscope prior to the electron microscope that was able to see the “pathogen” alive. I found it interesting that instead of using a scope that can observe the “pathogens” way of dealing with its environment changing from a toxic nature to something healthy it was substituted with a scope that needed to kill the “pathogen” to observe it. I found it convenient from a profit point of view to come up with many products to protect us many bugs when in fact it may be a bug going through changes in reaction to its environment. I’m not sure what Dr. Cowan view is but is it possible he’s referring to what I’m talking about? If your not seeing it alive are you seeing it? Is this true about microscopes in use now? What’s your thoughts? I’m looking to learn, I have suspicions but no firm position.