This flawed study was intended to be to used to counter whatever Kennedy cites in September as likely causes of Autism and other chronic health issues. The battle lines are being drawn. Corporate media as already evident will get behind the Danish study.
Maybe I'm overstating, but a vaccine civil war could be shaping up. I wouldn't be surprised if it got physical.
My normal, happy grandson turned feverish, then ASD zombie-like post, forced toxic aluminum-based MMR jab! But Big Pharma did okay, it's just a chance they are willing to take!
More confirmed is the exponential increase in post, mass-jabbed kids, going from a once 1 in 30,000 to our now [more profitable] 1 in 30 ASD, also Cancer, Asthma, Diabetes, disorders! So no aluminum in MMR can make you rest easy, Right?
SOOO GREAT! Hoping you stay on this supremely important topic. We need to keep this prominently featured in any discussion of childhood vaccines. Sharing
Going from a once 1 in 30,000 kids with ASD, Asthma, Cancer, etc, to our now mass-jabbed 1 in 30 sick kids could only happen in a Godless neo Sodom Gomorrah nation! Like the USA & UK! Because "The wages of Sin is Death."
You must admit, the definition changed. "Autistic" then meant catatonic; unable or unwilling to speak. The vast majority of Asperger's syndrome (which I suspect far predated aluminum injections) was undiagnosed. How about getting some uniformity of terms? Talking at cross purposes achieves no useful results.
Based on the historical understanding and diagnosis of autism,
Leo Kanner is widely credited with the first detailed clinical description of autism as a distinct condition, in his 1943 paper "Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact".
Kanner's paper described 11 children who exhibited a unique set of symptoms, including social withdrawal, communication difficulties, and repetitive behaviors. While the concept of autism has evolved considerably since then, the children described by Kanner in 1943 are considered the first formally recognized and documented cases of autism.
One of the most notable of these was Donald Triplett, identified as "Case 1" in Kanner's paper, who displayed symptoms of what Kanner termed "early infantile autism".
SaHib, I can't remember the year, but it was well before covid, but the largest refrigerated repository of brain tissue from people with autism lost its refrigeration/power and all those tissue samples meant for research were no longer viable.
Despite multiple fail safe systems that would kick in, they all failed, if I remember correctly(?) Some suggested for everything to have failed simultaneously looked very suspicious--maybe intentional. Those tissue samples could have shed light on many of the questions some don't want answered. Both mercury and aluminum's final resting place is in the brain, where it does the most harm.
A I. says, "Autism was first described as a distinct condition in 1943 by Leo Kanner, an Austrian-American psychiatrist. Kanner published a paper titled "Early Infantile Autism"
A I. says, Aluminum salts, like aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate, have been used as adjuvants in vaccines since the 1930s. Adjuvants help the immune system mount a stronger response to the vaccine. I say my only grandson was ASD harmed immediately, post-forced MMR jab! Do you believe everything our 62 billion in fraud fines pharma industry tells you? Is Truth a "cross-purpose" for our fraudulent Big Pharma?
For our Godless 62 billion in fraud fines, Big Pharma medicine, (That also is the leader in cause of death!) "The science is settled. The vast majority of scientists agree with whoever is funding them.
A study designed not to find harm will never find harm.
We know they are lying. They know they are lying. They know that we know they are lying. We know that they know that we know they are lying. And they still continue to lie.
Is the following citation in error? Can't find mention of genetics in it:
"Vaccine safety reviews acknowledge such adjuvant-induced autoimmunity in animal models and stress that genetic susceptibility modulates riskdoi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.062."
As soon as the editors replied in the ocmments I submitted another reply. They continue to ignore the fact that the effects all point preventative which binomial logic can indicate means 100% probability of serious risk-concealing confounding.
The paper provides much evidence to add to vaccine literatuer as a whole of confounding by contraindication (CBC). Not only is the paper full of spurious protective effects, but it reports nonlinear effects in the supplements. Lower exposure is riskier than higher exposure. Also characteristic of CBC.
As the decision to remain unvaccinated must be made no later than the first scheduled dose, there is less opportunity to observe emergent perceived contraindications, and no opportunity to observe perceived post-birth vaccine harm. This reduces CBC, making the unvaccinated *more similar* to the exposed – not the opposite.
The fact the authors and editors both quietly evaded the issue of clearly implausible results tells me what I need to know.
JWL: Could you submit a comment on mechanisms of Al harm? If not, I will do so. 400 word limit. It is important as it strengthens the arguments about confounding by contraindication, because some of that can potentially be driven by vaccine harms themselves.
Nuke Annals of Internal Medicine - the American College of Physicians (ACP), and Doctator Paul Offit! Keep it well controlled, like the demolitions of the WTC. I don't call for making a MOVE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOVE_(Philadelphia_organization) on Philadelphia!
This flawed study was intended to be to used to counter whatever Kennedy cites in September as likely causes of Autism and other chronic health issues. The battle lines are being drawn. Corporate media as already evident will get behind the Danish study.
Maybe I'm overstating, but a vaccine civil war could be shaping up. I wouldn't be surprised if it got physical.
My normal, happy grandson turned feverish, then ASD zombie-like post, forced toxic aluminum-based MMR jab! But Big Pharma did okay, it's just a chance they are willing to take!
😭
While I don't argue that your grandson reacted to the MMR, I don't think it contains aluminum. It's live
Confirmed. No aluminum in MMR
More confirmed is the exponential increase in post, mass-jabbed kids, going from a once 1 in 30,000 to our now [more profitable] 1 in 30 ASD, also Cancer, Asthma, Diabetes, disorders! So no aluminum in MMR can make you rest easy, Right?
Check out the facts on Disease death Vs. Jab death chart @ https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/judge-rules-in-favor-of-teen-in-medical?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#media-6c55461c-d6a0-4c33-a3c5-9b03588062ac:~:text=Judge%20Rules%20in,AUG%2014%2C%202025
It helps to understand why Big Pharma "medicine" IS the leading cause of Death!
SOOO GREAT! Hoping you stay on this supremely important topic. We need to keep this prominently featured in any discussion of childhood vaccines. Sharing
Going from a once 1 in 30,000 kids with ASD, Asthma, Cancer, etc, to our now mass-jabbed 1 in 30 sick kids could only happen in a Godless neo Sodom Gomorrah nation! Like the USA & UK! Because "The wages of Sin is Death."
You must admit, the definition changed. "Autistic" then meant catatonic; unable or unwilling to speak. The vast majority of Asperger's syndrome (which I suspect far predated aluminum injections) was undiagnosed. How about getting some uniformity of terms? Talking at cross purposes achieves no useful results.
My memory is poor, but I remember reading sections of Dan Olmsted's book on Leo Kanners first eleven cases of autistic behavior. They all, if I remember correctly(?) had some degree of exposure to mercury (ceresan). https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2007/04/17/The-Age-of-Autism-Mercury-link-to-Case-2/34791176825579/
From AI:
Based on the historical understanding and diagnosis of autism,
Leo Kanner is widely credited with the first detailed clinical description of autism as a distinct condition, in his 1943 paper "Autistic Disturbances of Affective Contact".
Kanner's paper described 11 children who exhibited a unique set of symptoms, including social withdrawal, communication difficulties, and repetitive behaviors. While the concept of autism has evolved considerably since then, the children described by Kanner in 1943 are considered the first formally recognized and documented cases of autism.
One of the most notable of these was Donald Triplett, identified as "Case 1" in Kanner's paper, who displayed symptoms of what Kanner termed "early infantile autism".
You beat me to it! For more interesting/ detailed info. on that sick topic, see! [Green Med info's]
"Mercury Pushers Called Herbalists "Quacks": The Medical Insult That Backfired!
https://greenmedinfo.com/content/mercury-pushers-called-herbalists-quacks-medical-insult-backfired
Hard to say. How many have remains one could assay for mercury? Granted, mercury exposure has been problematic throughout historical times.
SaHib, I can't remember the year, but it was well before covid, but the largest refrigerated repository of brain tissue from people with autism lost its refrigeration/power and all those tissue samples meant for research were no longer viable.
Despite multiple fail safe systems that would kick in, they all failed, if I remember correctly(?) Some suggested for everything to have failed simultaneously looked very suspicious--maybe intentional. Those tissue samples could have shed light on many of the questions some don't want answered. Both mercury and aluminum's final resting place is in the brain, where it does the most harm.
A I. says, "Autism was first described as a distinct condition in 1943 by Leo Kanner, an Austrian-American psychiatrist. Kanner published a paper titled "Early Infantile Autism"
A I. says, Aluminum salts, like aluminum hydroxide and aluminum phosphate, have been used as adjuvants in vaccines since the 1930s. Adjuvants help the immune system mount a stronger response to the vaccine. I say my only grandson was ASD harmed immediately, post-forced MMR jab! Do you believe everything our 62 billion in fraud fines pharma industry tells you? Is Truth a "cross-purpose" for our fraudulent Big Pharma?
Believe nothing they tell you. Even their patent disclosures are disingenuous crap!
For our Godless 62 billion in fraud fines, Big Pharma medicine, (That also is the leader in cause of death!) "The science is settled. The vast majority of scientists agree with whoever is funding them.
A study designed not to find harm will never find harm.
We know they are lying. They know they are lying. They know that we know they are lying. We know that they know that we know they are lying. And they still continue to lie.
– Alexander Solzhenitsyn
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/trialsite-news-in-the-spotlight-danish-aluminum-vaccine-study-debate-draws-reuters-coverage-91915e2f
Gratitude for your continued diligence in exposing falsehood and bringing truth to light!
Is the following citation in error? Can't find mention of genetics in it:
"Vaccine safety reviews acknowledge such adjuvant-induced autoimmunity in animal models and stress that genetic susceptibility modulates riskdoi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.062."
As soon as the editors replied in the ocmments I submitted another reply. They continue to ignore the fact that the effects all point preventative which binomial logic can indicate means 100% probability of serious risk-concealing confounding.
The paper provides much evidence to add to vaccine literatuer as a whole of confounding by contraindication (CBC). Not only is the paper full of spurious protective effects, but it reports nonlinear effects in the supplements. Lower exposure is riskier than higher exposure. Also characteristic of CBC.
As the decision to remain unvaccinated must be made no later than the first scheduled dose, there is less opportunity to observe emergent perceived contraindications, and no opportunity to observe perceived post-birth vaccine harm. This reduces CBC, making the unvaccinated *more similar* to the exposed – not the opposite.
The fact the authors and editors both quietly evaded the issue of clearly implausible results tells me what I need to know.
JWL: Could you submit a comment on mechanisms of Al harm? If not, I will do so. 400 word limit. It is important as it strengthens the arguments about confounding by contraindication, because some of that can potentially be driven by vaccine harms themselves.
Response from Hviid in Annals Int Med...
https://x.com/jsm2334/status/1955296281397481777
Great article.
However there are few errors (typo):
Few errors in your otherwise amazing text:
Only a tiny %, about 0.03%, of injected aluminum actually passes...
Should be: Only a tiny %, about 0.03%, of INGESTED aluminum actually passes...
the ingected for ?
There were more but can't find them anymore
Nuke Annals of Internal Medicine - the American College of Physicians (ACP), and Doctator Paul Offit! Keep it well controlled, like the demolitions of the WTC. I don't call for making a MOVE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOVE_(Philadelphia_organization) on Philadelphia!
Typo alert 🚨:
“Only a tiny %, about 0.03%, of *injected* aluminum actually passes through the intestine,…”
Pretty sure that should read INGESTED.
Thank you, as always, for this important post. I've added it to a curation of evidence on harmful vaccine ingredients:
https://birdseyeviewperspective.substack.com/p/she-pushed-for-tests-to-be-conducted