Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Weihan Xing's avatar

Do people who were "naturally" infected with Covid-19 and then recovered now have the exact same immune system breakdowns occurring as those who were jabbed repeatedly?

Dr. Paul Cottrell and Dr. Ana Mihalcea are claiming that doctors are finding catastrophic breakdowns in blood cells and in plasma as well as extensive tissue damage in both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.

One would think that picking up a few thousand pathogens through the nasal passages would constitute a qualitative and quantitative difference to the tens of billions or even trillions of mRNA-producing spike proteins that were directly injected into the arm.

IF the jabbed and un-jabbed alike are displaying multiple types of organ failure and much greater propensities of developing cancer (so Cottrell), then this would clearly let Pfizer et al. off the hook because they can easily claim, "See - they're all getting sick even those who have NOT had our products."

Someone should shed light on this growing confusion and conundrum.

David AuBuchon's avatar

- Is pathogenic priming the same thing as molecular mimicry?

- Are autoimmunity mechanisms proper to include in the definition of VIAIDS? AIDS is not considered autoimmune. To me, "immune deficiency" implies reduced ability to fight off disease, where as autoimmunity implies increased ability to cause oneself disease. Perhaps I would append pathogenic priming and failure of immune tolerance to the mechanisms in the Table 1 image and start building a second category of mechanisms relating to autoimmunity and other forms of self-harm. Or perhaps instead, find a better term than VIAIDS to capture all mechanisms of harm at once. But including "AIDS" obviously has an effective ring to it. Some bad suggestions: "VIAIDS+" or "VI-AIDS-AI".

- Don't forget to add IgG4 class switching. I also wonder if class switching could also cause increased tolerance to other coronaviruses?

18 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?