Share this postHammond Weighs in On The False Discovery Results Reported by Dr. Sin Hang Lee and Their Significance for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Trial Datapopularrationalism.substack.comCopy linkTwitterFacebookEmailNotesHammond Weighs in On The False Discovery Results Reported by Dr. Sin Hang Lee and Their Significance for SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Trial DataThis report is easy-to-read and will help those working through Dr. Lee's study.James Lyons-WeilerNov 10, 2022383ShareSubscribeShare Popular RationalismLeave a commentCertain persons would not care for this information to be shared widely.Share383SharePreviousNext
I thought the PCR results were 100% false as Drosten just guessed at what he thought the genetic sequence of Sars-cov-2 might be (he had no actual sample available when he created his PCR protocol) and selected a few pre exisitng genetic fragments as the basis for his PCR diagnostic tool.
The WHO lapped it up adopting this fraud test as the global standard and the rest is history.
It seems that Hammond doesn't understand the these terms, and how to use them, and more than Weiler....