Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andrew Devlin's avatar

Maybe those whose bodies have become spike protein factories through repeated jabs would benefit from a course of treatment with this?

idkfa's avatar

> achieving an approximately 30-fold reduction (bringing the viral load to 1/300 of its baseline level)

This is *extremely* misleading -- primarily because PLACEBO results in the reduction of the viral load as well.

From Phase 2A publication (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9578433/):

"The change from baseline in viral RNA level (log10 copies/mL) on day 4 was significantly greater in the ensitrelvir 125 mg (mean [SD], –2.677 [1.063]; difference from placebo, –1.408; P = 0.0029) and 250 mg (–2.761 [1.291]; difference from placebo, –1.492; P = 0.0039) groups versus the placebo group (–1.269 [1.228])."

Thus, we have the following results.

From BASELINE:

Dose-------------|----------Viral Titer (fraction)----------|----Viral Titer Fold Change

125 mg----------|----------0.0021------------------------|----------476

250 mg----------|----------0.0017------------------------|----------588

From PLACEBO:

Dose-------------|----------Viral Titer (fraction)---------|----Viral Titer Fold Change

125 mg----------|----------0.039------------------------|----------26

250 mg----------|----------0.032------------------------|----------31

That having been said, in Phase 2B, the Viral Titer fraction compared to placebo is only 0.39, and thus the fold change from placebo is *only 2.5 times*.

All that having been said, while PLACEBO (i.e., the immune system) results in very similar reduction of the viral load as well, it happens much slower, which ultimately produces the key benefit for the severely ill: quick reduction of the viral load.

This is the primary niche for these pharmaceutical products.

17 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?