Editorial (Science, Public Health Policy & the Law): Use of Arbitrary Cycle Threshold (Ct) Values in COVID-19 Virus Detection Must End
This will likely be my final article on PCR until the practice stops, so please make the most of your next few moments and share this widely!
Published 11/14/2022.
“An elementary problem with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) – recognized at its inception – is that non-specific binding of PCR primers to arbitrary targets will cause off-target amplification. This is true whether the target sequence is a gene sequence within a single individual, and it is true when the target is viral, such as the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome in a clinical sample. PCR is used routinely to produce enough copies, or amplicons, of the target nucleotide molecule so the sequence can be determined using either Sanger sequencing or Next-Generation sequencing…”
Fig 1 from the Editorial shows the False Discovery Rate of samples called “Positive” at specific nonQ-RT-PCR cycle thresholds.
EDIT - we know up to 43 CT is used.
PCR CT >25 = useless = Fraud = the foundation of the Plandemonium.
"they fooled the whole world with PCR testing"
Lukas Lion 1984
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EK0XjDunfI
High level question: is this likely the basic reason that the paw paw fruit and the goat tested positive for Covid when the then president of Tanzania asked for those samples to be tested? Seems logical to me as a non expert, but curious. John Magafuli questioned the tests from the beginning. I questioned them from an educated laymen’s perspective from the beginning and concluded they were BS so long as the CT could be amped up to maximum. Thanks!