Anti-Science NHS Scotland and NHS England Go Full-On Vaccine Risk Knowledge AVERSION
Response to reports of false infant death reports overtly admits a policy of changing records of the nature of birth (live vs. stillborn) and refusal to investigate maternal vaccination status.
I don’t know how John Campbell does it. He has to say what he thinks without saying it to stay on YouTube. This one nearly pushed this kindly gentleman over the edge.
So I will say what he cannot say.
While reviewing the data from NHS Scotland comparing the rate of neonatal deaths in Scotland, John Campbell mentions the doubling of deaths in neonatal infants, rising from a pre-COVID era rate of 2 in 1,000 live births to 4.6 deaths per 1,000 live births in March 2022.
One would expect that these data would trigger NHS Scotland to launch an investigation; and evidently, they did a “preliminary investigation” concluding that the increase was definitively NOT due to COVID-19.
The Scot Herald reported that somehow, public health “experts” ruled out COVID-19 vaccination as a cause of the neonatal death spike without checking the vaccination status of any of the mothers during pregnancy.
They quoted PHS as follows:
Public Health Scotland (PHS) said its consultants had given “careful consideration” to the “potential benefits and harms” of carrying out such as analysis as part of its probe into the tragic deaths of 39 infants, but concluded against doing so because “it was not possible to identify a scenario that would have resulted in a change to public health policy or practice” given that vaccination policy was already “appropriately informed by good-quality population-level evidence and safety data”.
“potential benefits and harms” of carrying out such as analysis” ??????????????
Now SCIENCE and KNOWLEDGE are a risk to public health???
…In a statement, PHS added that there was also a risk that “identifying the vaccination status of the mothers, even at aggregate level, would result in harm to those individuals and others close to them, through actual or perceived judgement of the effects of their personal vaccination decision”.
This is not real, is it?
I mean, we know the vaccine does not reduce transmission. PHS is saying that pregnant mothers must risk the life of their child to protect other people. PHS has gone completely off the rails and is anti-science.
...Furthermore “the outcomes of such analysis, whilst being uninformative for public health decision making, had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time”.
Vaccine confidence at ALL COSTS, even the loss of beloved newborn infants?
And how do they know it would be uninformative to public health decision-making?
The balance of risk analysis here only makes sense if
(1) One pretends the vaccine provides protection to others,
(2) One denies the reports of vaccine-related injuries and deaths.
…The decision came to light after the Herald on Sunday obtained internal emails and reports under freedom of information tracking the PHS response, with one email dated November 24 2021 stating: “We do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status, as there is no public health reason to do so”.
Previously PHS had said would not be disclosing the information to protect patient confidentiality.
One can only conclude that vaccine risk and death denialism, which is at the very core of public health policy in western countries is the ultimate anti-science exercise.
This information is clearly upsetting to John, who, upon reading this, stares at the camera and blinks for a full seven seconds.
But wait. It gets worse. Much worse.
NHS England Recoding Live Births as “Stillborn”
By denying them personhood, NHS England and the physicians involved in the neonatal units are exacting severely torturous and unforgivable harm on the parents of the live-born infants.
All to prevent coroners from determining the cause of death.
Yes, you read that right.
While John ultimately criticizes NHS England, he can’t say what most of us are thinking:
To a person, each “professional” involved should be arrested and charged with medical records falsification and made personally liable for civil damages to the families traumatized by their actions.
I have information that I am not at liberty to disclose that suggests that there will be an explosion of reports in the US and elsewhere of deaths in adults and children being recoded as “COVID-19” in 2020 (before the vaccine), and vaccine-related deaths in adults and children being recoded as condition unrelated to the patient.
If you lost a loved one to COVID-19 or to unexpected deaths following vaccination, request the medical records and then call BlueCross/BlueShield for the records THEY have. Any discrepancies, such as multiple, separate diagnoses of COVID-19 added to a patient’s record when the patient only had 1 diagnosis, or the incorrect cause of death, or any significant detail related to the cause of death that does not mesh with your personal experience or what the doctors told you should be reported as insurance fraud.
Watch John provide the harrowing details while walking a tightrope.
Days like today, after reading the plethora of criminal evidence perpetrated on us by our governments, make me feel hopeless in the face of this overwhelming evil. But how do I stop reading and sit back in ignorant bliss hoping the criminality will be outed and justice will be served to those who were unnecessarily injured and/or brutally murdered by the very agencies set up to protect them? Is there any real hope now that we’re this far down the rabbit hole of the global agenda for the destruction of humanity?
What everyone who is talking about this is missing is this:
By concluding, somehow, that they should NOT even find out the vaccination status of the mothers means that they, per their usual reasoning, could be ignoring a potential infant mortality BENEFIT of the vaccination mothers during pregnancy.
In a nutshell: what if all or most of the mothers who tragically babies were UNVACCINATED?
Uninformative...?
There is not a single scenario where it would be uninformative to have this information and resolve the doubt.
This is an egregious Betrayal of the public by such an agency.
This can only mean ONE thing. That they know that the result of an investigation would destroy vaccine confidence, and rightfully so. No other explanation fits such a troubling decision.