check out and read carefully a petition at citizengo.org ...final vote imminent reject the who pandemic treaty,,,,,,be aware its a worldwidee petition it can be signed and reshared widely worldwide from any country in the world including yours..it currently has over 300.000 signatures
Rather than all the charts and fake arguments that conflate mRNA TRANSFECTION with vaccines, that share nothing in common beyond syringe delivery, any true opposition would educate the public to understand this is decades old lab tool shown to be failed as medicine in 1999 with the death of Jesse Gelsinger.
To continue to argue p values as some legitimate argument against this lobotomy level criminal human medical experiment is as damning of the critics as its advocates. Foreign proteins will ALWAYS trigger immune system destruction of cells that manifest non-self proteins and every transplant doctor and patient has a firm grasp of this reality.
TRANSFECTION is a decades old lab tool used in every medical school & virology & pharma lab around the globe and branding as "novel use" turns mop & bucket level commodity to cash cow with fraudulent claims of therapy. Some honest biology would have saved millions. Instead asking the wrong questions and ignoring basic facts has perpetuated this slow motion genocide. https://web.archive.org/web/20200803152807/https://www.promega.com/resources/guides/cell-biology/transfection/
Thanks for all you're doing to shine a light on the corruption that was perpetrated on the American people as well as those citizens around the globe. Until those responsible are held accountable however, we will likely be forced to repeat this epic affront against our health. I define such circumstances as Crimes Against Humanity.
Just want to make sure I understand. Participants who developed symptoms shortly after vaccination but prior to 7 days for Pfizer, 14 days for Moderna, as well as symptomatic cases not PCR-confirmed were excluded from the results regarding effectiveness. Were they also excluded from the examination of adverse side effects and events? So, lets say someone got blood clots or even died in the 7 day period after the Pfizer vax or within the initial 14 day period after the Moderna jab. Were they totally excluded from the results?
I recall a Brasilian man who got severe myocarditis during this none counting period. Also all the pregnant woman they did not know if they delivered safely. Easy to tick "Lost to Follow Up" box to infer subject's decision to withdraw. Recall 13yr old Maddie DeGarry, paralysed, etc., they wrote she just got abdominal pain! If they were classed as unvaxxed for efficacy, were they classed same for safety? Good question! I think from past reading, anyone hospitalised could be classed as unkown, (not trial patients - the adverse event notification should be sent to the Principal Investigator's office in a timely manner, i.e. as soon as a study centre receives notification. If there is concern, the ethics committee informed. These trials did not meet the standards in manufacturing or clinically.
In retrospect it is apparent that it was never important if the "vaccines" were "effective". The purpose and intent was to get the mRNA into the bodies of people and to get mRNA treatments in to the arena. Normalization of making people GMO is not a small thing.
IMO the clot shots as treatment was secondary to getting clot shots in to bodies. The DOD operation was going to happen case closed. EUA was just the means not the end. And the purpose of EUA was to put in place impenetrable protection for using people as lab rats NOT to take a risk in order to help protect people. You need lab rats to do your experiments and one way to get 8 billion of them is to grant yourself blanket protection then coerce the lab rats to take the injections using whatever means available. WHICH THEY DID.
So determined were they to get their indemnification and protection and to get the experimental elixir in to bodies that both the definition of vaccine and "effective" were changed and tortured in order to get the predetermined outcome. And just to be extra safe they tried to hide the data for 75 years because they KNEW the harm they were about to inflict would be grievous and they KNEW the harm of the clot shots would far exceed any tortured "proof" that there would be a benefit.
If you produce enough reports with sufficient pages generated by "the experts" people are likely to never wade through "the evidence" and take your word for it. After all, the DOD attackers have billions and armies of techs to generate proof whereas the targets have limited resources, particularly if the attacker fires them and ostracizes them
If you have billions to spend but even more billions to gain you can write up all the fancy studies in the world to "prove" a point but the point was to get the stuff in to deceived bodies and harvest vast profit with utterly no accountability. As we speak mRNA is still being injected in to innocent bodies sure to cause further harm which proves evidence of efficacy or harm is irrelevant once it has been determined "we're going to stuff a GMO product in to people come hell or high water"
And now that the mRNA clot shots are an utter failure as a "vaccine" mRNA is still a smashing success as it is still being shoved in to innocent bodies and more importantly the $500 Billion Stargate project plans to use mRNA to generate cancer treatments with 48 hours of diagnoses. Perhaps Stargate will even be used to generate mRNA cancer treatments for cancers that were caused by the mRNA clot shots. That redefines the word synergy. mRNA to give you cancer and mRNA to treat it. What could be more genius?
check out and read carefully a petition at citizengo.org ...final vote imminent reject the who pandemic treaty,,,,,,be aware its a worldwidee petition it can be signed and reshared widely worldwide from any country in the world including yours..it currently has over 300.000 signatures
Rather than all the charts and fake arguments that conflate mRNA TRANSFECTION with vaccines, that share nothing in common beyond syringe delivery, any true opposition would educate the public to understand this is decades old lab tool shown to be failed as medicine in 1999 with the death of Jesse Gelsinger.
To continue to argue p values as some legitimate argument against this lobotomy level criminal human medical experiment is as damning of the critics as its advocates. Foreign proteins will ALWAYS trigger immune system destruction of cells that manifest non-self proteins and every transplant doctor and patient has a firm grasp of this reality.
https://web.archive.org/web/20121025034826/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/11/28/magazine/the-biotech-death-of-jesse-gelsinger.html
TRANSFECTION is a decades old lab tool used in every medical school & virology & pharma lab around the globe and branding as "novel use" turns mop & bucket level commodity to cash cow with fraudulent claims of therapy. Some honest biology would have saved millions. Instead asking the wrong questions and ignoring basic facts has perpetuated this slow motion genocide. https://web.archive.org/web/20200803152807/https://www.promega.com/resources/guides/cell-biology/transfection/
Thanks for all you're doing to shine a light on the corruption that was perpetrated on the American people as well as those citizens around the globe. Until those responsible are held accountable however, we will likely be forced to repeat this epic affront against our health. I define such circumstances as Crimes Against Humanity.
Just want to make sure I understand. Participants who developed symptoms shortly after vaccination but prior to 7 days for Pfizer, 14 days for Moderna, as well as symptomatic cases not PCR-confirmed were excluded from the results regarding effectiveness. Were they also excluded from the examination of adverse side effects and events? So, lets say someone got blood clots or even died in the 7 day period after the Pfizer vax or within the initial 14 day period after the Moderna jab. Were they totally excluded from the results?
I recall a Brasilian man who got severe myocarditis during this none counting period. Also all the pregnant woman they did not know if they delivered safely. Easy to tick "Lost to Follow Up" box to infer subject's decision to withdraw. Recall 13yr old Maddie DeGarry, paralysed, etc., they wrote she just got abdominal pain! If they were classed as unvaxxed for efficacy, were they classed same for safety? Good question! I think from past reading, anyone hospitalised could be classed as unkown, (not trial patients - the adverse event notification should be sent to the Principal Investigator's office in a timely manner, i.e. as soon as a study centre receives notification. If there is concern, the ethics committee informed. These trials did not meet the standards in manufacturing or clinically.
And let us not forget that these bioweapon jabs are forcing the body to make undisclosed proteins beyond the spike protein. and what are they doing?
https://primerascientific.com/pdf/pssrp/PSSRP-03-096.pdf
Wow! Thank you!
Whilst the placebo arm became obsolete due to accepting the miracle juice, there are plenty unjabbed to do studies. vaxcontrolgroup.com
In retrospect it is apparent that it was never important if the "vaccines" were "effective". The purpose and intent was to get the mRNA into the bodies of people and to get mRNA treatments in to the arena. Normalization of making people GMO is not a small thing.
IMO the clot shots as treatment was secondary to getting clot shots in to bodies. The DOD operation was going to happen case closed. EUA was just the means not the end. And the purpose of EUA was to put in place impenetrable protection for using people as lab rats NOT to take a risk in order to help protect people. You need lab rats to do your experiments and one way to get 8 billion of them is to grant yourself blanket protection then coerce the lab rats to take the injections using whatever means available. WHICH THEY DID.
So determined were they to get their indemnification and protection and to get the experimental elixir in to bodies that both the definition of vaccine and "effective" were changed and tortured in order to get the predetermined outcome. And just to be extra safe they tried to hide the data for 75 years because they KNEW the harm they were about to inflict would be grievous and they KNEW the harm of the clot shots would far exceed any tortured "proof" that there would be a benefit.
If you produce enough reports with sufficient pages generated by "the experts" people are likely to never wade through "the evidence" and take your word for it. After all, the DOD attackers have billions and armies of techs to generate proof whereas the targets have limited resources, particularly if the attacker fires them and ostracizes them
If you have billions to spend but even more billions to gain you can write up all the fancy studies in the world to "prove" a point but the point was to get the stuff in to deceived bodies and harvest vast profit with utterly no accountability. As we speak mRNA is still being injected in to innocent bodies sure to cause further harm which proves evidence of efficacy or harm is irrelevant once it has been determined "we're going to stuff a GMO product in to people come hell or high water"
And now that the mRNA clot shots are an utter failure as a "vaccine" mRNA is still a smashing success as it is still being shoved in to innocent bodies and more importantly the $500 Billion Stargate project plans to use mRNA to generate cancer treatments with 48 hours of diagnoses. Perhaps Stargate will even be used to generate mRNA cancer treatments for cancers that were caused by the mRNA clot shots. That redefines the word synergy. mRNA to give you cancer and mRNA to treat it. What could be more genius?