The Preliminary Injunction is Here. Here Are Some Critically Important Resources on PCR False Positives
I've Been Educating the Public Since April 2020 on this Issue. This Issue's Time has Finally Come.
Today, finally, some good news.
The temporary injunction on the Biden administration’s draconian mandate will offer some relief to millions of Americans who face being forced, against their wills, into receiving an injection that could have negative long term effects.
Companies across the US faced an uncertain future if the one-hundred million of non-vaccinating American workers opted for PCR testing rather than submit to the forced vaccinations sought by Biden through a ruling issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
Studies have shown that PCR testing has an unacceptably high false positive rate, meaning that each time a person would be tested, there would be a higher chance they would have to quarantine at home for ten days due to an error in the test than due to a viable infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The moment I realized the CDC and FDA were allowing the use of a single Ct for all patients, and that the Ct’s being used could be as high as 35 or 40 (or more), I knew the false positives would outnumber the true positives. They should have required negative controls per test and conducted truly quantitative RT-PCR.
That was April, 2020.
Individuals seeking published estimates and commentary on the heavy burden of false positive rates can find them in the following articles.
If you’d like to help us put the nail in the coffin of bogus testing, please fund the NAATEC consortium. We need $300K. We’ve raised 13K.
CRITICALLY IMPORTANT RESOURCES on BOGUS PCR TESTS
OPEN LETTER TO THE CDC ON REINFECTION RATES IN VACCINATED AND UNVACCINATED https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2021/09/01/open-letter-to-the-cdc-on-reinfection-rates-in-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated/
Lyons-Weiler, 2020a. Balance of Risk in COVID-19 Reveals the extreme cost of the false positives. Intern J Vacc Theor, Pract, Research 1(2):209-222.
COVID19 TESTS – HOW ACCURATE ARE THEY? CALL TO ACTION https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/11/13/covid19-tests-how-accurate-are-they-call-to-action/
FOLLOW THE SCIENCE, NOT MERE “AUTHORITY”, ON COVID19 PCR FALSE POSITIVE RATES
Basile K, Maddocks S, Kok J, Dwyer DE. Accuracy amidst ambiguity: false positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests when COVID-19 prevalence is low. Pathology. 2020;52(7):809-811. doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2020.09.009 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7524665/
False Positive Results With SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Tests and How to Evaluate a RT-PCR-Positive Test for the Possibility of a False Positive Result. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63:e159-162 doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002138 https://journals.lww.com/joem/Fulltext/2021/03000/False_Positive_Results_With_SARS_CoV_2_RT_PCR.23.aspx
False-positive COVID-19 results: hidden problems and cost https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(20)30453-7/fulltext
False Positives in PCR Tests for COVID-19 https://www.icd10monitor.com/false-positives-in-pcr-tests-for-covid-19
CDC Coronavirus Test Kits Generate 30% False Positive and 20% False Negative Results - Connecticut Pathologist’s Newly Published Findings Confirm
“Replace bogus PCR tests to avoid unnecessary Coronavirus lockdowns,” Urges Milford Molecular Diagnostics Director Dr. Sin Hang Lee https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20210621005496/en/%E2%80%9CReplace-bogus-PCR-tests-to-avoid-unnecessary-Coronavirus-lockdowns%E2%80%9D-Urges-Milford-Molecular-Diagnostics-Director-Dr.-Sin-Hang-Lee
Do we cause false positives? An experimental series on droplet or airborne SARS-CoV-2 contamination of sampling tubes during swab collection in a test center https://aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13756-021-00920-z
The truth about SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold values is rarely pure and never simple https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34314495/
What's Wrong with PCR Covid Testing https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/whats-wrong-pcr-covid-testing