The curious case of Lubbock, TX places the question of Standard of Care of measles, a treatable condition, in the bright spotlight: What is in the nation's best interest in the long run?
As usual …A Popular rationalism profound piece of extraordinary work !
I am sending this to my State representatives, family and friends .
I have decided to share many of the Popular Rationalism reports to bring to my physicians as I question many of their so-called recommendations to just give medication without seeking out the root cause. One example is , I argue constantly about statins..
After reading dissolving illusions by Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk , the efficacy of vaccines are questionable. The problem with immunoglobulin administered to newborns is definitely unnecessary as you so eloquently wrote.
I have learned so much with every Popular rationalism piece of work reflecting your wisdom and sharing important information at many levels.
Thanks for this excellent critique on the experimental more than empirical use of IVIG as post-exposure rubeola prophylaxis in newborns. Risks and informed consent be damned and move aside for medical heroes.
What is the chemical structure of NV-387? I can't seem to find it, and a naked alphanumeric drug candidate designation is less than informative. Does NanoViricides, Inc. (NNVC) refuse to say? Scam at least until more forthcome.
Curious if this woman was symptomatic or just tested positive or measles? If so, was she even infectious or contagious? It is such a dangerous precedent to not only be vaccinating people with a live virus vaccine while wild-type virus is circulating but to give IV Ig to infants without testing for maternal antibodies. Too few people understand vaccinology and vaccinal immunity most especially those in key public health roles. There needs to be a serious investigation into these recommendations going forward with consideration to immunity and correlates of protection for these practices.
As usual …A Popular rationalism profound piece of extraordinary work !
I am sending this to my State representatives, family and friends .
I have decided to share many of the Popular Rationalism reports to bring to my physicians as I question many of their so-called recommendations to just give medication without seeking out the root cause. One example is , I argue constantly about statins..
After reading dissolving illusions by Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk , the efficacy of vaccines are questionable. The problem with immunoglobulin administered to newborns is definitely unnecessary as you so eloquently wrote.
I have learned so much with every Popular rationalism piece of work reflecting your wisdom and sharing important information at many levels.
Thank you !
Thanks for this excellent critique on the experimental more than empirical use of IVIG as post-exposure rubeola prophylaxis in newborns. Risks and informed consent be damned and move aside for medical heroes.
I think their reaction would be Measles vaccine added to the schedule on day one, or IG injections for pregnancy. What else would they do?
What is the chemical structure of NV-387? I can't seem to find it, and a naked alphanumeric drug candidate designation is less than informative. Does NanoViricides, Inc. (NNVC) refuse to say? Scam at least until more forthcome.
Curious if this woman was symptomatic or just tested positive or measles? If so, was she even infectious or contagious? It is such a dangerous precedent to not only be vaccinating people with a live virus vaccine while wild-type virus is circulating but to give IV Ig to infants without testing for maternal antibodies. Too few people understand vaccinology and vaccinal immunity most especially those in key public health roles. There needs to be a serious investigation into these recommendations going forward with consideration to immunity and correlates of protection for these practices.