27 Comments

I sent an email to your business a few weeks back and hoping to confirm you received it or bring your attention to it since I’m sure you are bombarded. This was very relevant… it was information from one of the larger state colleges. It was a detailed syllabus for “Immunology” class. It included links of research and papers to review. A fascinating look into the curriculum. 🤔

Please let me know if you received it or if I should share elsewhere. Thanks for all you do!

Expand full comment

At this point, knowing what we know, anyone who places confidence in the validity/credibility of the psychological/psychiatric community should have their head examined.

/by whom is another question

Expand full comment

Dr. Jack, you can’t be the only reasoning, card-carrying scientist out there calling attention to this “PR campaign” messaging by the public health authorities. The best messaging they can give is a genuine apology and act of humility to admit they screwed up, and then quickly adopt decentralized protocols that mitigate corruption and allow for multiple inputs (aka #PlanB) in order to move forward together with sanity. Good one today! Keep going, mate.

Expand full comment

Nope. This is bogus. It's not a weird "purity" fetish that makes people think twice about injecting themselves with an experimental and ineffective new technology. It's common sense. The whole purity/disgust thing is an attempt to frame v safety advocates and bodily autonomy advocates as somehow neo-Nazi. False. (Isn't it sad we have to have "bodily autonomy advocates" now?) Injecting anything pharma can dream up into your body with no questions asked--THAT's weird.

Expand full comment
Sep 22, 2022Liked by James Lyons-Weiler

They are still missing it! So many of us are NOT all about individualism, especially women among those I know. We are connection and community-minded. And we RESPECT individual rights as well as support community connection and care. But this is not part of the male-led lexicon; women's views and ways are so rarely even acknowledged, let alone taken into account! Even My Body/ My Choice within feminism is about the rights of each and every member of the female community, individually and collectively, to individual sovereignty over her own body, and for women to sovereignty over our bodies. To reduce concern for sovereignty to "purity" is offensive!

Expand full comment

Not true for me and my family. Our conscious decision to refuse all vaccines (and the Covid shots) is based entirely on the science, in this case the lack of any science that proves efficacy and safety.

Expand full comment

C19 shots are not vaccines. They do not decrease infection or transmission. According to the study of 2305 vials of C19 shots and boosters, from 12 different C19 shot and booster manufacterers, NO mRNA or DNA of anything non-human is contained in these vials, according to Dr Poornima Wagh's Internation Scientific group.

They DID find:

aluminum

tungsten

strontium

osmium

lead

nickel

sodium

SM102 (Moderna)

PEG (Pfizer)

hydrogel nanoparticles

The C19 shots and boosters are Chemical bioweapons of mass destruction that damage human cells, particularly lung cells, blood vessel cells, teproductive cells, and nervous tissues.

Expand full comment

"vaccine risk aware" - good reframing, I will use.

Expand full comment

When I came here to comment, Outlook flagged your site as unsafe to open. I continued anyway... ;-)

Your Nature link is broken. Can you please refresh it or provide the DOI or title/authors? Thanks.

Expand full comment

I find the terms used interesting. "Purity"?? Or lack thereof in the shots? LOL.

"Vaccine Risk Aware" I love. The mischief part of my brain is saying "I know something you don't. Na na na na na" in the most infantile, childish way possible. Love it.

Expand full comment

"...personal moral values, not classic "conservative" and "liberal" ideology, is associated with vaccine uptake. Association with "purity" implies "Vaccine Risk Aware" is a better label."

Maybe "...personal moral values" explain a "purity" association. Just as personal moral values explain political opinion.

I'm reminded of Jonathan Haidt's Disgust Scale.

Expand full comment