“specifically, an unproven, highly speculative link between vaccine additives and autism — have little to no scientific evidence behind them, straining any alignment between public health experts and the MAHA world.” So, what specifically would be needed here for “scientific proof”? The very same prospective RCT public health officials have refused to do for decades? How long should we wait? The retrospective safety data studies promised and written into the 1986 liability law never done? The evidence we see every day, post-vaccination, of sudden and severe regression? The Ford study just released not scientific enough? How so exactly? Highly speculative? Hmm…
We should return to Precautionary Principle and evidence of safety and efficacy demonstrated rather than assume safety. In fact there is NO biological mechanism to explain how intramuscular injection can usefully augment the immune system for what is purported to be viral pathogens that produce T-cell response.
To paraphrase the brilliant biological research by Dr. Jay Couey the chief scientific advisor for RFK Jr Wuhan book.. "Intramuscular injection is a dumb idea from the 1800s" his explanation of basic immunology the best lay person guide to just how insane it is to bypass all the innate barriers and use puncture wounds to trigger beneficial immune system reaction.
Reminded me of Dr. Walters histology classes stating: “It’s just a tube”.
What is particularly ironic and annoying is the two tiered level of proof needed. One to push through a vaccine with zero placebo, and the other to prove vaccine ingredients are in fact implicated in encephalopathy which has purposely been mislabeled as autism so as to deceive the lay person. But what takes the cake even more is the fact that this author was hired by Paul Thomas, MD to run data from his office that showed the unvaccinated children were far more healthy than the vaccinated children and yet he stands up on a podium here and claims a highly speculative connection between aluminum and other vaccine ingredients and encephalopathy/autism. In any world other than medicine and purported science, you couldn’t make this stuff up and have it be believable.
One of the single most important discussions when it comes to health. The vast majority of Americans - even those who read this post and agree with it - very willingly poison themselves, their families, and everyone they come in contact with with their obsessions with with toxic poisons, euphemistically referred to as "fragrances".
“specifically, an unproven, highly speculative link between vaccine additives and autism — have little to no scientific evidence behind them, straining any alignment between public health experts and the MAHA world.” So, what specifically would be needed here for “scientific proof”? The very same prospective RCT public health officials have refused to do for decades? How long should we wait? The retrospective safety data studies promised and written into the 1986 liability law never done? The evidence we see every day, post-vaccination, of sudden and severe regression? The Ford study just released not scientific enough? How so exactly? Highly speculative? Hmm…
We should return to Precautionary Principle and evidence of safety and efficacy demonstrated rather than assume safety. In fact there is NO biological mechanism to explain how intramuscular injection can usefully augment the immune system for what is purported to be viral pathogens that produce T-cell response.
To paraphrase the brilliant biological research by Dr. Jay Couey the chief scientific advisor for RFK Jr Wuhan book.. "Intramuscular injection is a dumb idea from the 1800s" his explanation of basic immunology the best lay person guide to just how insane it is to bypass all the innate barriers and use puncture wounds to trigger beneficial immune system reaction.
https://stream.gigaohm.bio/w/mAyR15Hpvn7rEc1NT4fuqp
Reminded me of Dr. Walters histology classes stating: “It’s just a tube”.
What is particularly ironic and annoying is the two tiered level of proof needed. One to push through a vaccine with zero placebo, and the other to prove vaccine ingredients are in fact implicated in encephalopathy which has purposely been mislabeled as autism so as to deceive the lay person. But what takes the cake even more is the fact that this author was hired by Paul Thomas, MD to run data from his office that showed the unvaccinated children were far more healthy than the vaccinated children and yet he stands up on a podium here and claims a highly speculative connection between aluminum and other vaccine ingredients and encephalopathy/autism. In any world other than medicine and purported science, you couldn’t make this stuff up and have it be believable.
Toxins, or human-made chemicals? Is this conflation an intentional distraction? The article would be far more readable without that distraction.
One of the single most important discussions when it comes to health. The vast majority of Americans - even those who read this post and agree with it - very willingly poison themselves, their families, and everyone they come in contact with with their obsessions with with toxic poisons, euphemistically referred to as "fragrances".