Reading Ed Dowd's book, "Cause Unknown" and seeing hundreds of children drop dead from their mRNA shots, indicates nothing rare about ruining their hearts.
First and primary, the HHS must convince me without a shadow of a doubt that "modern medicine" is the only road to take to be well. Convince me that filling my body with toxic and poisonous drugs and vaccines is the way to be healthier.
Too little too late. Like "EAT REAL FOOD", people need to get REAL INFECTIONS. Vaccines provide ultraprocessed "infections" that result in INAPPROPRIATE immune reponses that are neither safe nor effective. Did we demand RCTs to switch to REAL FOOD? Why do we need more studies to revoke vaccines that are known to be dangerous? Common sense and gold standard science are still missing at CBER/CDER.
I can not imagine any rational health professional reading this and not agreeing or at least acknowledging it. Every choice should be based on benefit verses risk but the benefit and risk must be known and if not known that must be acknowledged as well. Prior to this it seemed that many vaccination policies were based on “ not giving anti-vaxxers any ammunition “ or anything that allowed for “missed opportunities “, not actual benefit verses risk for the individual.
Reading Ed Dowd's book, "Cause Unknown" and seeing hundreds of children drop dead from their mRNA shots, indicates nothing rare about ruining their hearts.
First and primary, the HHS must convince me without a shadow of a doubt that "modern medicine" is the only road to take to be well. Convince me that filling my body with toxic and poisonous drugs and vaccines is the way to be healthier.
When is the CDC going to update it's Vaccine Information (VIS) Statements? See this - "Despite approving a major policy shift, the CDC continues to distribute vaccine information it knows is no longer accurate — denying people informed consent." Maryanne Demasi, PhD https://open.substack.com/pub/maryannedemasi/p/cdc-still-misleading-people-with?utm_source=direct&r=14opcj&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=post%20viewer
Too little too late. Like "EAT REAL FOOD", people need to get REAL INFECTIONS. Vaccines provide ultraprocessed "infections" that result in INAPPROPRIATE immune reponses that are neither safe nor effective. Did we demand RCTs to switch to REAL FOOD? Why do we need more studies to revoke vaccines that are known to be dangerous? Common sense and gold standard science are still missing at CBER/CDER.
I can not imagine any rational health professional reading this and not agreeing or at least acknowledging it. Every choice should be based on benefit verses risk but the benefit and risk must be known and if not known that must be acknowledged as well. Prior to this it seemed that many vaccination policies were based on “ not giving anti-vaxxers any ammunition “ or anything that allowed for “missed opportunities “, not actual benefit verses risk for the individual.