37 Comments

I say thank you to those people too! Thanks!!

Expand full comment

I'm looking forward to the new channel ... Sounds a great idea!

Expand full comment

GREAT POST! And very true - it's about getting the message out!! Things are very tight all over and with everyone - $5 may not seem like a lot but when you're subscribed to numerous newsletters it adds up! Furthermore I can't possibly fathom many of these writers actually need the FUNDS! Steve Kirsch and Peter McCullough just to name two! How can they not possibly see it's us against corporate media? Do we really need to pay for truth?

Expand full comment

Speaking of Peter McCullough--did you read his recent post about effectiveness of early medical treatment for Covid with Mulnupiravir and, I think, another drug? Was he quoting a medical paper? How could he? Mulnupiravir is far more expensive and far less effective than Ivermectin which Merck also developed and now wishes to discredit in order to entice people to layout thousands of dollars for treatment. Mulnupiravir promotes rapid replication of spike protein until it's no longer effective. HOWEVER, all this rapid evolution also raises risk of cancer. I am not a fan of either Mulnupiravir or Paxlovid--both drugs developed to replace Ivermectin which they discredited but secretly envy. Only Dr. Lyons-Weiler never fails to impress me.

Expand full comment

Wow, I am very disappointed to hear that Dr. McCullough is endorsing Mulnupiravir. That certainly changes the way I feel about him. You’d think he’d know we are now on guard about anything coming from big Pharma, especially a copy cat of Ivermectin !

Expand full comment

I want to know if I am correct, and if anybody else heard him promote Mulnupiravir. Statistically, there could actually be a short term benefit. He may wish to be without bias and going by the medical journal papers. I'm so outraged by big Pharma that I am at risk of over reacting. So he may have just quoted a paper. Dr. McCullough deserves our respect because he's been unstinting in his criticism of mRNA vaccines and promotion of effective medical treatments instead.

Expand full comment

Here is a link to evaluations of Paxlovid, Mulnupiravir, and Ivermectin.

https://covid19.onedaymd.com/2022/01/paxlovid-vs-ivermectin-vs-molnupiravir.html

Expand full comment

I’m too surprised Dr Peter McCullough was Promoting those two drugs although totally agreement of the earlier treatment success with antivirals Peter should talk again with Dr. Perri Kory especially after the latest podcast I saw by Robert F Kennedy Jr where they discuss the shenanigans behind drug promotions over others because of profits cost , the comparison of those two drugs with the ivermectin and how ivermectin has 10 other components of effectiveness compared to those two expensive drugs the podcast I’m referring to is

“Doctors discuss the Fauci film” a new documentary that came out with with people like Dr.Peter McCullough Dr. Robert Malone and Dr Perri Kory along with Robert F Kennedy

Expand full comment

I posted a link to Dr. McCullough's substack article mentioning Mulnupiravir. Did I jump to a false conclusion: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/early-use-of-mulnupiravir-associated

Expand full comment

No matter who it is even one that I have huge respect for it’s alright to Challenge a statement or question to get clarification if we’re wrong we’re wrong it’s better to ask if you’re not sure of his position meaning Peter McCullough on those two drugs Mulnupiravir and Paxlovid that you refer to and that was his early approach during the pandemic see what would work as he noted an antiviral and corticosteroids to treat the disease symptoms to get the patients stabilized.

It’s my understanding that there was a two-tier approach treating the overreaction of the body’s symptoms “the inflammation “ to the disease and treating the viral load stopping viruses replicating in the body…..

Expand full comment

I agree that it's fruitful to have debates which may include disagreements--but hold up moral outrage until we thoroughly explore each other. I revisited this substack article by Dr. McCullough which was quite recent. I copied his justification for using Mulnupiravir. I believe he said that he wanted to establish treatment protocols -- not just rely on vaccines. Yes, we do already have effective treatment protocols which rely on Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, etc. See flccc.net. HOWEVER, most doctors will not use these "alternative" protocols because MSM has thoroughly discredited them. So it seems he was looking for medical papers promoting treatments that might be acceptable to pro vaxxers. I didn't challenge him because I think it's probably a good idea to develop many different treatment approaches. If it turns out that he's pivoting away from Ivermectin--then I would want to challenge. Because I believe Mulnupiravir is associated with risk of cancer. The reason for Ivermectin is to reduce the risk of mRNA vaccines by making them unnecessary. But if we replace vaccines with something equally risky--what have we gained?

Expand full comment

Totally agree if that’s the case if he is turning away from advocating Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine because of pressure from above then he should be challenged because I believe there are over 400 studies on ivermectin alone of the effectiveness and safety should be the top reason to use it but also agree we should have an arsenal of treatments in case these don’t work for certain individuals, again he should have another sit down talk with Dr. Perri Kory

Expand full comment

Here is what Dr. McCullough wrote at beginning of his post: "When both Paxlovid and Mulnupiravir were rolled out as EUA oral drugs to treat COVID-19 I accepted them clinically and placed them as antiviral options in the McCullough Protocol. One of the reasons for my early adoption was that I knew any novel drug advanced by Operation Warp Speed and endorsed by the CDC, FDA, and NIH would engage doctors who wanted to treat patients but were fearful of the stigmata associated with prescribing hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin." So it seems he's trying to find drugs to treat Covid that would be accepted by the pro Vaxx community.

Expand full comment

Has anyone put forth this question to his Substack and was there a reply from him?

There's just something about that man I don't trust. It is BLINDINGLY obvious he has ulterior motives, I just don't what they are! At first I thought a health care cabinet position and that still might be his goal, but when he says things like this, it totally clouds the picture. Isn't he a staunch advocate of monoclonal antibodies and wasn't there also huge skepticism about those?

What's sets off red flags for me is there is not a speech he gives where he does not mention being the most published doctor or cardiologist in the world yet - prior to covid no one ever heard of him?!?

Another alarm bell is how he constantly states still seeing patients?!? How is that even possible given his schedule? He's always someone and HOW DOES HE HAVE time to write all these papers as well?

I know if my doctor were that busy I sure as hell wouldn't be seeing him! He talks 90mph (certainly not an anomaly for the Irish) but how he remembers all the stats and figures he states is also alarming! He's clearly been doing this a very long time

my guess is he's clearly gunning for something - why was he allowed to get away with all the things he said while others lost their licenses - were terminated (eventually he was) jailed - censored and banned everywhere? It was the same thing with Tucker Carlson - how was he allowed to get away with all he did as well while others were crucified?

Expand full comment

Thanks for the suggestion. I will ask "What about Ivermectin." Good idea. Meanwhile, if you want a very cynical discussion of all the "anti-vaxx" substack authors, look for Sage Hana. She questions the motives of Robert Malone and Steve Hersch. She is hilarious in pointing out the people claiming to be "heroes" She calls them hero balls. And she also is hilarious about people saying the big Pharma was just inept--didn't really mean to harm us--just trying to promote good health. She calls this "Dolts botching shit" I am laughing/crying!

https://sagehana.substack.com/p/in-54-days-in-fall-2021-dr-robert

Expand full comment

Hi Diana I view the post you put up there of Dr. Robert Malone I watched many of his earlier post on this subject and he was very hesitant to talk of the dangers at the onset stating let’s wait for the data but he was against the mandates from the very beginning I watched Dr. Robert Malone Dr John Campbell as well a well-known cardiologist in the UK Dr Aseem Malhotra morphed into who they are today as far as their outspoken opinions against this mRNA COVID-19 vaccines , I would say the only two that I know for sure that were very cautious were Dr. James Lyons Weiler and Dr. Gary Null that from the onset were warning of not to push vaccines out before it’s time . It took Dr. Aseem Malhotra dads death to open his eyes to the dangers of the MRNA COVID-19 vaccines his dad who also is a doctor convinced him to take the vaccine and he did he took two doses because he felt he wasn’t in the risk group In which prior he promoted the mRNA Covid 19 vaccine national on media in the UK , these 3 I just mentioned had a rude awakening to the corruption and bias and lack of dialogue within their own institutions that they worked for they believed in the beginning that the vaccine was safe they believed that the institutions health institutions the NIH CDC and WHO Were worthy of their recommendations they had a rude awakening and I watched how they grew out of this Disillusion to the realization of the total capture regulatory capture of said institutions.

Expand full comment

Thanks for this post. I'm enjoying a reasoned debate/discussion on this platform.

Expand full comment

Same here I enjoy a discourse of ideas always open to other’s opinions , beautiful thing about life you and never stop learning.

Expand full comment

Hi Diana here is an update on our concerns about using Mulnupiravir over ivermectin a clip in Gary Nulls podcast called The Progressive Commentary Hour , Dr. Pierre Kory discusses the efficacy of ivermectin at the third Covid summit in Brussels again I don’t understand how Dr. Peter McCullough is not aware of this is he scared to fight on this particular front of regulatory capture , I don’t know ?

the podcast is dated May 23 2023 the part is at the very beginning of the podcast

Expand full comment

I read that post and if I recall I couldn’t comment to ask that question because I don’t have a paid subscription for McCullough. Honestly, other than James, I’m not sure who and who not to trust and wouldn’t give my money to most of them even if I could.

Expand full comment

Excellent!!!

Expand full comment

I can't wait for our new channel!

Expand full comment

Congratulations on your perseverance and success. I enjoy a free subscription because the only income I have is SS. If that changes, I will pay you.

Expand full comment

I’m in that boat as well and paying medical bills etc, but hoping to get to the point where I’m caught up and able to subscribe. Such great information. When I do have a little leftover I sign up for a class. I love all that James is doing! Getting the info out there is the most important thing and he’s doing it for free. I can’t say thank you enough!

I wish there weren’t so many others whose articles I start to read, find informative and end up not being able to finish bc I can’t pay. Everyone must do what they think is best I guess.

Expand full comment

Wonderful expansion! Best of luck!

Expand full comment

Thanks for all you do! I heard Jimmy Dore interview Matthew Desmet about "true believers" who suffer from "mass formation." Desmet said that no amount of rationalism can persuade true believers that vaccines are not safe and effective. It's like a religion--or a cult. BUT if we give up and stop speaking the alternative viewpoints, true believers will become more and more rejecting of the opposite viewpoints until they may become totally controlling--or even violent, as they did in Nazi Germany. So thank you for doing your part to keep me out of quarantine housing that my governor is trying to build in upstate NY. And thanks for providing my stimulating intellectual environment at ipak-edu.

Expand full comment

👍 in other words “Freedom isn’t free” a quote that’s been used over decades which is true

I’ve been reposting my ass off of all these evidence-based science and scientist clinicians physicians posts podcasts radio shows whatever I can find to put on my Facebook page from the likes of course “Dr. James Lyons Weiler” Dr. Robert Malone . Dr. Pierre Kory ,Dr. John Campbell , MP from UK Parliament Bridgen Dr Gary Null and others I would say between my pretty cat pictures puppy pictures my adorable baby elephants with her mom beautiful landscapes with Beautiful birds 🦅😊 And of course my selection of I think great music from my favorite artists.

I would say that my medical of COVID-19 pandemic coverage is about 60 to 70% of my posts on my Facebook My account has been recently hacked so I haven’t been on there for about a week I’m in the processor to get it back up we’ll see how that works out but yes freedom isn’t free and sometimes the consequences of being ostracized from your family and friends is the price you pay but I don’t wanna live in a world that I have to worry about offending people cause the truth hurts their feelings or their orthodoxy concept of truth , don’t wanna walk on eggshells to discuss my points of views my opinions my feelings otherwise I don’t think life is worth living if you can’t express how you feel , to me that’s an inalienable right for all that Thompson Jefferson spoke of his great speech of freedom and the Pursuit of happiness of individuals

Expand full comment

Thank you Eric and everyone who shares!

Expand full comment

No thank you

You’re the man Dr. James Lyons Weiler proud to help disseminate and be apart of like minded people on your substack your hard work is so uplifting to your dedication to truth from evidence based medicine and science 👍😊

Expand full comment

As a free subscriber and a fellow author whom you can also read and comment on for free, here is what I can see for the time being.

Everything is free on my site, too, although I offer a few bonuses for paid subscriptions. I don't interrupt my articles with the disruptive begging inserts, either. I didn't start it for the money, but I hope, eventually my revenue here will match at least minimum wage. The commitment requires most of my time, which limits my other means to make money. The good thing is that my readership is steadily growing; 19 people joined only in the last two days, 3-4 thousand visitors a day is normal, and I have 1,569 subscribers.

When I started a year ago, I estimated about one in a 100 subscriptions paid. To my surprise, I am at 1:74. Your 1:45 is about the same percentage, if we consider that I am more expensive.

Currently, I am working my 8-16 hours on Substack for nearly $10 a day, which means you are making about $150, which is already not bad, but that depends on how many people are involved in the publications. I am doing this alone, but my wife helps me a lot.

However, you are also offering products that bring in money, and depending on their success, the result exceeds the above estimate.

Expand full comment

Wow!

Expand full comment

Yes thank you. Whenever I see a “preview” with important info for health paywalled, I want to weep. The opposite of beneficence during this life-threatening crisis for humanity. I always unsubscribe. Creates another elite comparable to the ones harming us all. Not in a crisis please.

Expand full comment

I don't want to falsely accuse Dr. McCullough of promoting Mulnupiravir. Please read his substack article https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/early-use-of-mulnupiravir-associated

Expand full comment

In the end the only way we are going to win back our health freedom is to support champions like Jack who devote their time and resources to independent safety research. Something, HHS is incapable of doing. Money well spent. Thanks for making this available to all Jack.

Expand full comment

Recently viewed a clip from Dr. John Campbell of a MP maybe some of you heard of him in the UK Andrew Bridgen and he’s on the Parliament floor discussing the new treaty amendments that are going to be voted by member states I don’t hear a word in this country about it , giving the WHO vast powers over us and the people of the world the so called arbiter of truth of what science is what misinformation and disinformation is now as Dr. James Lyons Weiler has noted WHO CDC and FDA have a horrible track record I don’t wanna give them any more power than they already have it’s been totally captures more like 60 % to 80% from outside interests the likes of big Pharma and I recently learned that everyone works for WHO have diplomatic immunity and pay no taxes and not voted on by us the people there’s a debate in the UK Parliament is there such a debate in our senate ?

Expand full comment