27 Comments
User's avatar
Bob's avatar

I had high hopes that RFK Jr. and the rest were more than just good talkers, and that their deeds would reflect their words. The early returns are not good.

djean111's avatar

Put not your trust in princes. Read that somewhere.

Maurine Meleck's avatar

This is outrageous. I thought the HHS was over the FDA. I just don't get it.

Another WorldView Is Possible's avatar

WTF?!?! What in the hell is going-on at FDA?!?!? Where's the 'Big Win' -from getting Bobby in charge of HHS? This is exactly what we'd have expected to see under Xavier Beccera! Whoever approved this, format - trial - approval... SHOULD BE FIRED. Prosecuted, even.

If Bobby was trying to give his critics from the Health Freedom side of things credence - MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

Jayne Doe's avatar

Genetically modifying humanity. Like gmo'd corn, soybeans, and mosquitos.

djean111's avatar

Looks like HHS has now decided that antisemitism is the biggest threat to American health

https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/ending-anti-semitic-harassment-on-college-campuses.html

Hopefully, HHS won't decide that all the complaining about mRNA online diverts attention from antisemitism and the US does not accede to Israel's demand that anything deemed antisemitic is deleted from social media!

Marc G. Wathelet's avatar

I have been incensed about self-amplifying RNA shots since they were started in Japan last year. I find it completely unacceptable that such human experimentation is casually carried out, they are playing apprentice-sorcerer again despite the mRNA shots disaster. These self-replicating RNA are bound to find their way in exosomes and thus will eventually be exhaled, exposing people sharing the same air to that self-amplifying RNA, without their consent. This is maddening and criminal, there is no urgency justifying taking such a risk. And for the HHS/FDA to fast-track this product instead of shelving it until all the proper studies are carried out is a disgrace.

Ricardo H's avatar

They want most of us DEAD‼

Stephanie Schiltz's avatar

Dr. Lyons-Weiler, what can the everyday citizen do to help?

Share these shortcomings so the public understands? Share them with local legislators?

DanB1973's avatar

Does this mean that now anyone can launch any medical product without any safety studies?

If the alleged pathogen is “contagious”, and there is no requirement to prove protection against infection and transmission capacity, what’s the point of approving such a product?

Isn’t it warp speed on steroids?

Can we escalate this approach to the entire business world? Like, issuing financial instruments without security? Or manufacturing glass or plastic bottles for food without testing them first? Or appointing people to any posts without verifying their skills, responsibility and capacity? Or paying out salaries and pensions without requiring background documents?

Everything will be easier and faster, clearly.

Lori Weintz's avatar

I don't see anywhere in the Moderna package insert where it says mNexspike is a self-amplifying product. Where can I find this information? It's bad enough that they've given full approval to a product that was only EUA to begin with, but the idea of saRNA is horrible.

Nuala Norris's avatar

The innocent public is being experimented upon, using irreversible, fatally-damaging procedures. We are not here talking therapeutics or medicinal substances of any kind. It is an insult to the intelligence to attempt to discuss the products in those terms.

Pete Lincoln's avatar

What is the evidence it is a self amplifying vaccine? I see no such description in the trial reports

Lori Weintz's avatar

I know they're experimenting with self-amplifying RNA, and I know the industry has stated intention to convert all vaccines to mRNA, but I wasn't aware that self-amplifying "vaccines" were already hitting the market. This is what I would like to know, too. Where can we find out if mNexspike is using self-amplifying technology?

Pete Lincoln's avatar

Its not a self amplifying mRNA vaccine. Zero evidence to support this. Others have patents like GSK, Gritstone Bio, and Janssen Biotech, with companies like Ziphius Vaccines and Imperial College Innovations on saRNA for COVID-19 and when describing their vaccine clearly

Describe it. Moderna has no known patents and began its Phase I trial on mRNA 1283 (not saRNA) in 2021. Its not saRNA

The Offsc℞ipt Pharmacist's avatar

I cant find any evidence it is a self-amplifying vaccine either. Here are the slides from ACIP

https://www.cdc.gov/acip/downloads/slides-2025-04-15-16/02-Rizkalla-COVID-508.pdf

Pete Lincoln's avatar

Thanks. Here is my post on the vaccine approval before the self amplifying buzz which I think is meant to distract from the approval itself and total lack of transparency

https://pete843.substack.com/p/they-did-it-again?triedRedirect=true

Ricardo H's avatar

This is a bloody bioweapon engineered to replicate, shed and infect all of us no matter what we do‼ Those clueless pathetic fools that took part in this criminally diabolical trial could potentially infect millions in the coming months alone‼ This is a DISASTER in the making‼

Dee Dee's avatar

We're not dying fast enough.

Jerms 9654's avatar

More proof that RFK and Makary are frauds. What a joke.

John Day MD's avatar

There is consternation that it cannot be readily found in writing that this product is actually sa-mRNA.

Do you have a reference, James?

Sasha Latypova and Tessa Lena would like to see it, as would many of us.