I watched your discussion on the Rounding the Earth Podcast last might. First off I have to say to say the entire discussion was superb! After listening I can’t wait to take classes offered on IPAK so I can credibly discuss the Biology myself to expose the lies for greed or whatever else.
Here is the challenge from those that are sceptical of the foundational claims of virology as explained by Dr Sam Bailey.
(In an interview you cited in an earlier sustack one of your criticisms of virus sceptics was that they do not put forward a method of falsifying viral theory.)
I'm sure you will agree that the challenge is scientific and rational and orthodox virologists should be able to complete the challenge with ease - if their claims are valid.
If the foundations of orthodox virology are faulty the implications are massive.
If orthodox virology is sound then they will be able to complete the challenge as all it involves is virologists processing samples and identifying viruses as they claim they do as a matter of routine.
If the five orthodox labs don't get it right and/or come up with different genomic sequences for the same samples we will have evidence that there is a serious problem.
Blasphemy! A direct attack on our saviour THE SCIENCE™
I watched your discussion on the Rounding the Earth Podcast last might. First off I have to say to say the entire discussion was superb! After listening I can’t wait to take classes offered on IPAK so I can credibly discuss the Biology myself to expose the lies for greed or whatever else.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/MIbJXREq4Z56/
Hi James
Here is the challenge from those that are sceptical of the foundational claims of virology as explained by Dr Sam Bailey.
(In an interview you cited in an earlier sustack one of your criticisms of virus sceptics was that they do not put forward a method of falsifying viral theory.)
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/are-viruses-even-a-scientific-theory:2
I'm sure you will agree that the challenge is scientific and rational and orthodox virologists should be able to complete the challenge with ease - if their claims are valid.
If the foundations of orthodox virology are faulty the implications are massive.
If orthodox virology is sound then they will be able to complete the challenge as all it involves is virologists processing samples and identifying viruses as they claim they do as a matter of routine.
If the five orthodox labs don't get it right and/or come up with different genomic sequences for the same samples we will have evidence that there is a serious problem.