A Response to Stacy B. Buchanan’s Essay in MedPage Today. The irony is thick, her own COI speaks volumes. She will have to work with people who use words like "risk" and "injury" BEFORE the vote.
As well as considering the conflicts of interest of members of the ACIP, it must also be investigated why members, who are generally medical doctors, have collaborated with vaccine mandates.
These MDs know the vaccines they approve are likely to be mandated by the states - how could they collaborate with mandates and thereby endorse the violation of valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination?
How could they be a party to destroying a bedrock medical principle - informed consent and respecting the free choice of the patient?
If these captured, paid minions would spend half the time doing Real research and testing that they do on criticizing those who dare to disagree with their pharma-backed pseudoscience, (let's just change the definition of a vaccine to meet our dangerous MRNA drugs), maybe people would actually trust them and their results. This purging was way over due, and those receiving pay checks on these committees will now have to get jobs in pharma spreading more lies and deceit.
As a retired surgeon, this article is spot on. It is incumbent on anyone writing or publishing a scientific paper, or giving a talk at a medical conference, to make inform everyone of the potential conflicts of interest by the author or speaker. Failure to do so represents an egregious breech of ethics. If I am giving a talk about meshes used for hernia repair and state that the mesh from Gore is the best, but fail to disclose I am a consultant to Gore, then my talk is all noise and nothing more.
Yes, Kennedy of course is doing the right thing. Unfortunately, most people are exposed to the opposite narrative promoted by pharma and media. How do we break this strangle hold on the public?
This: “What is perhaps most revealing about Buchanan’s article is not what it says, but what it presumes: that the public should trust systems that have failed them, simply because the participants say they meant well.”
"At a time when MedPage Today could enhance its tarnished image and increase its credibility, it pulls “a JAMA job” and descends into the abyss with its “Public Health Purge!” purity spiral. You have to bevstuck on the cognitive dissonance hamster wheel to find its piece about the RFK, Jr. restructuring of the ACIP."
The purity spiral is decidedly pointed downward for these medical editorial boards. Sad.
"At a time when MedPage Today could enhance its tarnished image and increase its credibility, it pulls “a JAMA job” and descends into the abyss with its “Public Health Purge!” purity spiral. You have to bevstuck on the cognitive dissonance hamster wheel to find its piece about the RFK, Jr. restructuring of the ACIP."
The purity spiral is decidedly pointed downward for these medical editorial boards. Sad.
I really hope that last line of this article comes true. My opinions are out. This admin has failed misserably as of late. FDA still approving dangerous vaccines.
As well as considering the conflicts of interest of members of the ACIP, it must also be investigated why members, who are generally medical doctors, have collaborated with vaccine mandates.
These MDs know the vaccines they approve are likely to be mandated by the states - how could they collaborate with mandates and thereby endorse the violation of valid voluntary informed consent for vaccination?
How could they be a party to destroying a bedrock medical principle - informed consent and respecting the free choice of the patient?
If these captured, paid minions would spend half the time doing Real research and testing that they do on criticizing those who dare to disagree with their pharma-backed pseudoscience, (let's just change the definition of a vaccine to meet our dangerous MRNA drugs), maybe people would actually trust them and their results. This purging was way over due, and those receiving pay checks on these committees will now have to get jobs in pharma spreading more lies and deceit.
As a retired surgeon, this article is spot on. It is incumbent on anyone writing or publishing a scientific paper, or giving a talk at a medical conference, to make inform everyone of the potential conflicts of interest by the author or speaker. Failure to do so represents an egregious breech of ethics. If I am giving a talk about meshes used for hernia repair and state that the mesh from Gore is the best, but fail to disclose I am a consultant to Gore, then my talk is all noise and nothing more.
Yes, Kennedy of course is doing the right thing. Unfortunately, most people are exposed to the opposite narrative promoted by pharma and media. How do we break this strangle hold on the public?
This: “What is perhaps most revealing about Buchanan’s article is not what it says, but what it presumes: that the public should trust systems that have failed them, simply because the participants say they meant well.”
Another Popular Rationalism truth bomb. Kudos.
Restacked with this:
"At a time when MedPage Today could enhance its tarnished image and increase its credibility, it pulls “a JAMA job” and descends into the abyss with its “Public Health Purge!” purity spiral. You have to bevstuck on the cognitive dissonance hamster wheel to find its piece about the RFK, Jr. restructuring of the ACIP."
The purity spiral is decidedly pointed downward for these medical editorial boards. Sad.
Another Popular Rationalism truth bomb. Kudos.
Restacked with this:
"At a time when MedPage Today could enhance its tarnished image and increase its credibility, it pulls “a JAMA job” and descends into the abyss with its “Public Health Purge!” purity spiral. You have to bevstuck on the cognitive dissonance hamster wheel to find its piece about the RFK, Jr. restructuring of the ACIP."
The purity spiral is decidedly pointed downward for these medical editorial boards. Sad.
Poor, poor RFK Jr. So misunderstood.😂 https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/rfk-jr-s-acip-bloodbath-i-hope-youre-all-up-to-date-on-your-vaccines/
Hopefully the public will continue their awakening and
will walk away from all vaccination en mass.
I really hope that last line of this article comes true. My opinions are out. This admin has failed misserably as of late. FDA still approving dangerous vaccines.
These people are not used to having their petulant waffle deconstructed, point by point. They’re… offended.
Your rebuttals deserve the widest possible circulation.