28 Comments
User's avatar
Roger Beal's avatar

Cross-posted this article to Jeff Childers' "Coffee & Covid" substack, which has many thousands of readers.

Expand full comment
V. N. Alexander's avatar

Are we sure that suicide is unlikely to be biologically affected by vaccination? There are suicide reports in VAERS, which makes me think that family members noted unexpected changes in people's mental health soon after vaccination.

Expand full comment
DUANE HAYES's avatar

We've seen massive increase in unwarranted aggression, rapid onset dementia, there was a list of like 12-18 mental disorders caused from the mRNA shots. Suicide would be another mental disorder.

Expand full comment
Steve  Mitzner's avatar

Yes, tampering with and shutting down the immune system is a real money maker for our beloved, 50 billion in fraud fines, Big Pharma, and the mortuary industry! God Jesus has a health plan that guarantees everlasting life and health! [Fact!] ALL at only the cost of Jesus's blood, & [not yours!] How cool is that?

Expand full comment
Deanna Kline's avatar

please call out encephalitis- brain inflammation- and avoid use of the word dementia. by definition dementia does not occur rapidly! It is acute brain inflammation or mental status change from a trigger or ill health cause or delirium in a sickness or dehydration/malnutrition but dementia is not rapid!

Expand full comment
DUANE HAYES's avatar

I don't care what it's called, I've seen with my own eyes brilliant people lose all their faculties in 2-3 months.

Expand full comment
Deanna Kline's avatar

Trust me I know, saw it since early 21 in dozens. Wrote a book 📖 on it in 22 and sold in 15 nations by early 23. Documenting lots of cases I saw as a PCP. All Im saying is don’t perpetuate the lie the public falls for that it was dementia, call it brain inflammation or- encephalitis. https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0BYMMW3QM/ref=tmm_kin_swatch_0?ie=UTF8&dib_tag=se&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.M86xAoCnd_VT-MDKp7RcWwn_hna_nFYP6LWK_lmUKJvGjHj071QN20LucGBJIEps.J2bBJKZW39J2Hi3PBdgRAQl5xoJWNIUF7VPcMcS5EUw&qid=1746625592&sr=8-1

Expand full comment
Steve  Mitzner's avatar

@V.N.: "Unlikely to be biologically affected by vaccination." Flys in the face of the thousands of kids who killed themselves, their parents, their classmates, all while jacked up or down on SSRI's ! Fact: "A 33% higher risk of premature death compared to non-users."[Fact:] (Once) one could Google, "Sad SSRI stories" and get a long, long list of newspaper clipings on SSRI deaths, (But for Pharma's sake, they were removed! and replaced with a "Correlation doesn't mean causation" prayer! Did you know that Big Pharma medicine is the leading cause of Death?

P.S. See: 37 Mass Shooters Who Were On Antidepressants

By Jerome London. @ https://thought.is/37-mass-shooters-who-were-on-antidepressants/

Expand full comment
MBP's avatar

Plus those who killed themselves after being so devastatingly injured by the vaccine.

Expand full comment
Steve  Mitzner's avatar

Yes, Suicide is #1 (yet unmentioned) side effect of SSRIs! [Fact:] Vaccine's side effects are best demonstrated in the un-Godley amount of kids with jab-induced (ADHD) autism spectrum disorder (ASD), Cancers, Respiratory and anxiety disorders, etc. etc. That our jab happy, 50 Billion in Fraud fines, Pharma says your kid needs! Would a fraudster lie to you?... Would Satan lie to you? Some will never wake up to what God did and made for us! Vaccines are safe & effective! Who needs a God, when you have Big Pharma medicine? Right.

Expand full comment
IceSkater40's avatar

Agree. I know of people who have committed suicide due to vaccine injury. But for the most part, I think it’s the exception and not the rule. (A lot of factors have to combine for someone to succeed at suicide)

Expand full comment
James Lyons-Weiler's avatar

Excellent point as always.

Expand full comment
Steve  Mitzner's avatar

When one compares this short test life to our next everlasting one, I'm waiting for a Twelve-month follow-up study on all-cause, everlasting Life that went to God's glorious Heaven. Vs. the suckers that went to Death as an everlasting P.O.W. in Satan's Hell! For what profit a Man to gain health and riches, only to spend his or her everlasting retirement,…in Satan's horrific Hell?

Expand full comment
KP Stoller's avatar

The Pfizer bioweapon encodes for more than the Spike Protein... Pfizer admits to 4 other proteins, but since they lie it could be 400.

The Modified Messenger RNA Platform and the Creation of Unintended Proteins: A Genocidal Trojan Horse

April 2024

DOI: 10.56831/PSSRP-03-096

Kenneth StollerKenneth Stoller

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379509838_The_Modified_Messenger_RNA_Platform_and_the_Creation_of_Unintended_Proteins_A_Genocidal_Trojan_Horse

Expand full comment
MBP's avatar

Unfortunately there are still way too many, the majority, of physicians and scientists who say all this is misinformation and the vaccines were the holy grail. Will they ever see the truth?

Expand full comment
Steve  Mitzner's avatar

The science is settled. The vast majority of scientists agree with whoever is funding them! [Fact!:]

Expand full comment
SueShoffiett's avatar

No, MBP, not in this life. Whoever fails to glimpse the truth by now is willingly blind!

Expand full comment
M. N. Mead's avatar

I find it interesting that the impact of mRNA “vaccine” brand is age-dependent. Suppl. Figure 1 indicates that the Pfizer shots stole more lives from younger people (<70) while the Moderna shots killed more people over age 70. So the more elderly have died faster after Moderna, likely due to comorbidities and frailty fueling greater susceptibility to higher spike production from Moderna’s higher mRNA dose.

Moderna may cause more serious cardiac events with successive doses. Large cohort studies in Canada (Buchan et al) and Scandinavia (Karlstad et al) found excess myocarditis incidence was 3-5 times higher for younger males (ages 16-24) after the 2nd dose of Moderna’s mRNA-1273 compared to 2nd dose of Pfizer’s BNT162b2. Gao et al. (n=59 million) found that mRNA-1273 resulted in twice the risk of myo/pericarditis when compared to BNT162b2 (RR, 4.15; 95% CI=1.87-9.22, versus RR, 2.19; 95% CI=1.46-3.29, respectively).

Could DNA contamination and batch variability be playing a role in the longer-term effects? Pfizer's product has notable levels of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), and this dsRNA can trigger immune-inflammatory responses via the MDA5 protein, potentially causing cardiac problems. European Medicines Agency found dsRNA and other process-related impurities in both Pfizer and Moderna products. However, Dr. Kevin McKernan claims that the DNA contaminants are 10 times higher in the Pfizer products (despite having 1/3 the RNA content). The disparity could help explain the divergent patterns in the Florida study.

For more details and citations, please see our landmark Myocarditis paper in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Research & Innovation:

https://cardiovascular-research-and-innovation.reseaprojournals.com/Articles/myocarditis-after-sars-cov-2-infection-and-covid-19-vaccination-epidemiology-outcomes-and-new-perspectives

Expand full comment
Deanna Kline's avatar

I just read your study last week. Recognized your initials and last name. Thank you for this work! Put it in my updated presentation last Thursday for small gathering. Some batch variability examples: howbad.info -the gentleman was kind enough to feature my book there, sold in 15 nations over 2 yrs ago on these harms seen clinically from 21-22.

Expand full comment
M. N. Mead's avatar

Thank you Deanna. That paper was a labor of love! I hope you can help spread the word. It should be on Pubmed by the end of May. Keep up the good work!

Expand full comment
Deanna Kline's avatar

I was recently prepping a pp for an updated presentation and noted several studies stuck in preprint, delays and neglects to address them. A trend with studies addressing vax harms it seems.

Expand full comment
Newsbrain's avatar

Outstanding. Thank you.

Expand full comment
IceSkater40's avatar

I’d like to see DFAC for unvaccinated. I think that’s a more important comparison than IFR and would be a true apples to apples. Not sure if that data would be big enough to try and match though. But if it is - that would be the best comparison.

Expand full comment
James Lyons-Weiler's avatar

Yes, surely. But the regulatory comparison is the effects of the vaccines vs. the virus in the vaxxed.

Expand full comment
IceSkater40's avatar

True, but this study is all cause mortality, so I think the mortality rate from covid isn't sufficient comparison because we don't know what the baseline all cause mortality would've been for the population without vaccine. The IFR is covid specific. (Really this comparison would probably make the vaccines look worse - but it's needed for a true apples to apples comparison and I'd expect is possible to do given that there is a sufficient unvaccinated population in the state.)

Expand full comment
David AuBuchon's avatar

Czech Republic data says just the reverse:

https://drclarecraig.substack.com/p/moderna-was-more-deadly-than-pfizer

Moderna more mortality than Pfizer.

Expand full comment
Morris, Jeffrey's avatar

This paper is a well-designed study of all cause, covid-attributed, and non-covid attributed death rates two brands of vaccines.

But it does not provide any information about whether either vaccine increased risk of death, whether vaccinated death rates are greater than unvaccinated, or the causal reason for any difference between the brands.

The claims any difference must be caused by a safety issue is speculation, and not implied by the study.

Expand full comment