Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2
Just as ACIP warms up to a vaccine with no benefit and all risk to children... this.
From Bruttel, Washburne and VanDongen (Germany & USA), uploaded today, 10/20/2022
Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic origin of SARS-CoV-2
Abstract
To prevent future pandemics, it is important that we understand whether SARS-CoV-2 spilled over directly from animals to people, or indirectly in a laboratory accident. The genome of SARSCOV-2 contains a peculiar pattern of unique restriction endonuclease recognition sites allowing efficient dis- and re-assembly of the viral genome characteristic of synthetic viruses. Here, we report the likelihood of observing such a pattern in coronaviruses with no history of bioengineering. We find that SARS-CoV-2 is an anomaly, more likely a product of synthetic genome assembly than natural evolution. The restriction map of SARS-CoV-2 is consistent with many previously reported synthetic coronavirus genomes, meets all the criteria required for an efficient reverse genetic system, differs from closest relatives by a significantly higher rate of synonymous mutations in these synthetic-looking recognitions sites, and has a synthetic fingerprint unlikely to have evolved from its close relatives. We report a high likelihood that SARSCoV-2 may have originated as an infectious clone assembled in vitro.
Quote
"The genome of SARSCOV-2 contains a peculiar pattern of unique restriction endonuclease recognition sites allowing efficient dis- and re-assembly of the viral genome characteristic of synthetic viruses. Here, we report the likelihood of observing such a pattern in coronaviruses with no history of bioengineering. We find that SARS-CoV-2 is an anomaly, more likely a product of synthetic genome assembly than natural evolution. The restriction map of SARS-CoV-2 is consistent with many previously reported synthetic coronavirus genomes, meets all the criteria required for an efficient reverse genetic system, differs from closest relatives by a significantly higher rate of synonymous mutations in these synthetic-looking recognitions sites, and has a synthetic fingerprint unlikely to have evolved from its close relatives. We report a high likelihood that SARSCoV-2 may have originated as an infectious clone assembled in vitro."
It is all graphene / nanotechnology poisoning
So, those CRIMINALS just added THIS to the "vaccine" "schedule": ALC-0315 and ALC-0159
Intended for research purposes. Not suitable for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic use
https://outraged.substack.com/p/so-those-criminals-just-added-this
The Science (TM) says it was from a natural source: bat soup.
The scientific method accumulated data points that requires the generation of alternate hypotheses to disprove. Time consuming and requiring attention to detail and process.
Which one has yet to be disproven?
Bat soup was easy to generate and was much easier to disprove.
But the Science (TM) has the cudgel of force, compliance and farce.
Once those wear off, the Science (TM) has no place to hide.