Big News: IPAK Phase 2 Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study to be Published Monday
Phase 2 of the Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study will be published online on Monday
Following blinded peer review, the second publication of results from ten years of data from Dr. Paul Thomas’ pediatric practice in Oregon will be published.
I decline to provide the name of the journal until it is published.
The paper describes results that show - unequivocally - that the speculative guesswork “concerns” alleged by a single reader of the Phase 1 study were completely unsupported by data from the practice.
The paper, entitled “Revisiting Excess Diagnoses of Illnesses and Conditions in Children Whose Parents Provide Informed Permission to Vaccination”, will set the record straight and will allow parents and pediatricians around the country to point to objective, peer-reviewed data regarding the overall health effects of vaccines on children.
The paper also includes a result of a question posed to me by Dr. Blaylock, my co-author and now collaborator: what happens to the risk of adverse health outcomes in older children whose parents have stopped accepting vaccines? This is an important question because if parents who are already vaccinating can improve their children’s health by avoiding the neurotoxins and immunotoxins in vaccines, they might wish to state their wishes on the question of continuing vaccination. If vaccine cessation is associated with improved health, then we as a society should work to confirm the results and make decisions on the best path forward toward the reduction of chronic illness in our children and young adults.
The results from these data validate past results from studies like those from Dr. Anthony Mawson and Dr. Brian Hooker.
Popular Rationalists should please prepare to share news of this new study - and its important results - early next week.
Stay tuned for more news, and please consider gifting a subscription to someone who might want to learn more.
Thank you Dr. Lyons-Weiler.
I plan to share it with the world.