This is a giant leap forward for consumer health and safety in America. I recommend the FDA for this effort promoting transparency about the chemicals in our food supply.
definitely a big step in the right direction. consumer demand and market share are much more powerful than regulatory fines, which again and again, prove no barrier to mega corporations who just pay a fine as a 'cost of doing business'. the consumer is none the wiser with that. now average folks CAN be wiser and manufacturers can be responsive. thanks for highlighting this, Dr Jack. (will be sharing this in my biomed group tonight)
Am I missing something? When I looked, it didn’t contain specific brands and their measured levels, but rather the guidance levels for various contaminants and commodity categories. An important step but less than what I was hoping for.
This is a giant leap forward for consumer health and safety in America. I recommend the FDA for this effort promoting transparency about the chemicals in our food supply.
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
definitely a big step in the right direction. consumer demand and market share are much more powerful than regulatory fines, which again and again, prove no barrier to mega corporations who just pay a fine as a 'cost of doing business'. the consumer is none the wiser with that. now average folks CAN be wiser and manufacturers can be responsive. thanks for highlighting this, Dr Jack. (will be sharing this in my biomed group tonight)
Am I missing something? When I looked, it didn’t contain specific brands and their measured levels, but rather the guidance levels for various contaminants and commodity categories. An important step but less than what I was hoping for.
Are herbicides, desicants, preservatives, gmo's, "vaccines," food coatings and shellacs or insects, included in these transparency tools?