What People, Universities, and Pharma Do Not Yet Understand About the Kennedy Regulatory Bar: It Signals the End of the Regulatory States of America. #SharingIsCaring
So well-articulated, and I have seen this all along. How is it that there are some in the MAHA movement that don't see this bigger picture? Their lack of understanding is expressed in condemnation of Kennedy, and it is very unhelpful. Trying to explain this is met with hostility. It seems Kennedy simply ignores the barking and one step at a time continues to implement this smart strategy.
Excellent and comprehensive essay detailing the strategies of Secretary Kennedy's HHS. Your point about banning the mRNA vaccines outright is well taken. However.....there should be an IMMEDIATE marshalling of all available worldwide data since the rollout of these shots, documenting the deaths and disabilities, and subjecting them to the kind of scrutiny described in your article. There is no doubt that once this is done, the justification for their removal from the market will be obvious. This would also raise the issue of Pharma's culpability in the carnage we have witnessed in the wake of these products. (We also have Dr. Naomi Wolf's and Amy Kelly's masterful, groundbreaking Pfizer Papers to add to the piles of already existing data.) So much damage has been done to populations globally, that accountability simply cannot wait. If not by fiat, then by expeditious, and strategic scrutiny, these gene-therapy products MUST be removed from the market before they cause further damage. I applaud Secretary Kennedy's bold actions--purging ACIP of conflicted members and replacing them with seasoned, credentialed scientists stands out among them. However the issue of banning the mRNA technology is EXISTENTIAL and needs to be prioritized.
Our family has been denied due process for more than two decades. We were purposely railroaded in 2002 by Congress, even after Judge Weinstein had merely "stayed" our case vs. Thimerosal. We had the evidence. Later we were "dismissed" after the 'Lilly Rider" was attached to the Homeland Security Act, literally in the middle of the night. Then to add insult to injury, our USCFC/VICP claim was not allowed "tolling" under the 36 month limitations rule. Something one might expect in Russia. Not in our Constitutional Republic. I suggest the following path in Mr. RFK's scope:
1) Force rules in the VICP which provide for "tolling" for minors that are vaccine injured, as do every State in the Union. Most say claims can be brought until majority or indefinitely for anyone who is "incompetent" not ever being able to act on their own behalf.
2) This will revive any/all cases "dismissed" without ever being heard. This is in the tens of thousands.
3) Overwhelm the USCFC. This should force the hand of Congress to end the vaccine liability shield, as the Govt could never hear, let alone pay for all the claims sure to be brought.
We all should continue to lobby the Congress to revive the legislation which provides for an immediate end to the "vaccine carveout."
Only then can justice be served. I'm 73 and already instructed our older son to carry this mission to completion after the demise of my wife and me, so that his brother's ruined life will serve as testimony to warn those who think they have the right to harm others is possible.
Outstanding review - it is indeed common sense to support more vigorous science, remove big pharma liability protection, eliminate financial conflict of interest, improve transparency and allow patient consent!
This is most timely! What many scientists / researchers need to have clarified. Once again, THANK YOU! I could ask "Who handed you the perfect crystal ball?" but I know that the future leaves an imprint on the pure of heart. Posting now on social media. I do have a question, what happened with the recent CBER approval of the RSV Vaccine? I know that the increased number who died in the RSV group was not statistically significant but still... It seems they went by titers for effectiveness?, not long term enough for safety. Hopefully the new ACIP will not recommend the RSV vaccine for the CDC schedules, too risky, not enough safety or efficacy shown. Your thoughts? Clarifications?
The bar according to McCullough for drug and vaccine safety was 5 deaths resulted in a black box warning and 25 deaths the product is pulled. Let’s not move those goalposts please to appease corporate and government interests.
If these guidelines were actually followed for vaccines, all of them would almost certainly be off the market by now. Because pharmaceutical corporations got their way, they continue to be required for most American kids in order to attend school
I am not going to disagree with the content of this article. It is indeed well articulated, and I will never be against making modern medicine safer. But is this a "not seeing the forrest through the trees" paradigm? Kennedy may very well be playing the long-game to make America healthier, but is his overall stated goal of increasing confidence in vaccines a clever redirect, if not an obfuscation from real truth? Let's start with the need for vaccines, period. Hell, let's start with the Rockefeller promoted notion of germ theory. Scrutinizing these details will probably bring everyone to the conclusion that there should not be any trust in any vaccines at all because they will be deemed unnecessary.
If you want to argue that there is no such thing as viruses and or bacteria and other pathogens and/or infectious diseases then please be explicit, such as by linking to where such arguments are made to your satisfaction.
Everyday experience and rigorous science has lead most people to conclude that these things are real.
You should also provide links to arguments that detailed studies of viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2 spike protein's structure and complex mechanical behaviour https://www.nature.com/articles/s41580-021-00418-x are either a fraud or part of a massive delusion.
I do not typically entertain anyone such as yourself who uses the authors of, and facilitators of a deceit that has been the greatest cause of harm and death upon the human race since the beginning, to justify the very deceit (who do you think controls what Nature prints). But I do here to provide others with a means of protection from your words. Any critical thought and questioning would have brought you to these authors, and many others who have clearly illustrated the flawed science of germ theory.
Maybe I've worked in the legal world too long. But speaking as an editor, I see no basis for your use of "bar" here. I think "approach" would be more appropriate.
I continue to really appreciate the clarity of your writing, and your efforts to systematize the progress being made.
This makes sense - show, transparently, Why the mRNA products are impossible to make safe. (Then again there are at least thousands of studies that already do this .... but if the public is able to see them scrutinized in a new administration and they are removed because they don't meet common sense regulations ... that would be great)
What worries me are the many forces that stacked against Kennedy from doing what he wants to do ... I voted Against whatever puppets Harris, that mandated those awful shots (they're Still mandated for healthcare workers), and I voted, with hope and trust, For two people whose names weren't on the ballot but I hoped would be part of the administration - Kennedy and Tulsi Gabbard.
Seems like now that the empire / neocons agenda is at odds with what Tulsi wants - peace and not WW3 - she's being sidelined. "I don't care what she thinks", Trump said. Pharma is as evil and bloodthirsty for expansion as the neocons, just inside all of our bodies, instead of all over the map. I hope and pray Kennedy is able to accomplish his goals.
I actually consider covid to be a beast of a disease that I'll always take some precautions for, but being injected with instructions to make spike protein is surely not one of them.
If there are any honest people among this site (the account at Bluesky who shared it Is a good soul who truly believes all this), could they ever process that HCQ and Ivermectin worked all along?
They were initially funded by a Robert Wood Johnson grant, and now say they're just funded by donations. There are still a lot of honest people who can't comprehend how deep the official narrative has lied ...
Great explanation and a great stab in the fraud of vaccine safety. One quibble though:
"Journalists like yourself assume that vaccines are encountering the same kind of rigorous safety testing as other drugs, including multiyear double-blind placebo testing. But the fact is that vaccines don’t."
As RELATIVELY thorough as testing for other drugs is, that testing is also fraught with fraud.
I can understand that implementing the "Kennedy Bar" will take some time.
But in the interim, FDA approvals must be BARRED. The fools Makary and Prasad are killing people approving mNEXSPIKE, mRESVIA, menQuadfi and other poisons.
So well-articulated, and I have seen this all along. How is it that there are some in the MAHA movement that don't see this bigger picture? Their lack of understanding is expressed in condemnation of Kennedy, and it is very unhelpful. Trying to explain this is met with hostility. It seems Kennedy simply ignores the barking and one step at a time continues to implement this smart strategy.
Excellent and comprehensive essay detailing the strategies of Secretary Kennedy's HHS. Your point about banning the mRNA vaccines outright is well taken. However.....there should be an IMMEDIATE marshalling of all available worldwide data since the rollout of these shots, documenting the deaths and disabilities, and subjecting them to the kind of scrutiny described in your article. There is no doubt that once this is done, the justification for their removal from the market will be obvious. This would also raise the issue of Pharma's culpability in the carnage we have witnessed in the wake of these products. (We also have Dr. Naomi Wolf's and Amy Kelly's masterful, groundbreaking Pfizer Papers to add to the piles of already existing data.) So much damage has been done to populations globally, that accountability simply cannot wait. If not by fiat, then by expeditious, and strategic scrutiny, these gene-therapy products MUST be removed from the market before they cause further damage. I applaud Secretary Kennedy's bold actions--purging ACIP of conflicted members and replacing them with seasoned, credentialed scientists stands out among them. However the issue of banning the mRNA technology is EXISTENTIAL and needs to be prioritized.
Our family has been denied due process for more than two decades. We were purposely railroaded in 2002 by Congress, even after Judge Weinstein had merely "stayed" our case vs. Thimerosal. We had the evidence. Later we were "dismissed" after the 'Lilly Rider" was attached to the Homeland Security Act, literally in the middle of the night. Then to add insult to injury, our USCFC/VICP claim was not allowed "tolling" under the 36 month limitations rule. Something one might expect in Russia. Not in our Constitutional Republic. I suggest the following path in Mr. RFK's scope:
1) Force rules in the VICP which provide for "tolling" for minors that are vaccine injured, as do every State in the Union. Most say claims can be brought until majority or indefinitely for anyone who is "incompetent" not ever being able to act on their own behalf.
2) This will revive any/all cases "dismissed" without ever being heard. This is in the tens of thousands.
3) Overwhelm the USCFC. This should force the hand of Congress to end the vaccine liability shield, as the Govt could never hear, let alone pay for all the claims sure to be brought.
We all should continue to lobby the Congress to revive the legislation which provides for an immediate end to the "vaccine carveout."
Only then can justice be served. I'm 73 and already instructed our older son to carry this mission to completion after the demise of my wife and me, so that his brother's ruined life will serve as testimony to warn those who think they have the right to harm others is possible.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/9828
Outstanding review - it is indeed common sense to support more vigorous science, remove big pharma liability protection, eliminate financial conflict of interest, improve transparency and allow patient consent!
This is most timely! What many scientists / researchers need to have clarified. Once again, THANK YOU! I could ask "Who handed you the perfect crystal ball?" but I know that the future leaves an imprint on the pure of heart. Posting now on social media. I do have a question, what happened with the recent CBER approval of the RSV Vaccine? I know that the increased number who died in the RSV group was not statistically significant but still... It seems they went by titers for effectiveness?, not long term enough for safety. Hopefully the new ACIP will not recommend the RSV vaccine for the CDC schedules, too risky, not enough safety or efficacy shown. Your thoughts? Clarifications?
The bar according to McCullough for drug and vaccine safety was 5 deaths resulted in a black box warning and 25 deaths the product is pulled. Let’s not move those goalposts please to appease corporate and government interests.
If these guidelines were actually followed for vaccines, all of them would almost certainly be off the market by now. Because pharmaceutical corporations got their way, they continue to be required for most American kids in order to attend school
I am not going to disagree with the content of this article. It is indeed well articulated, and I will never be against making modern medicine safer. But is this a "not seeing the forrest through the trees" paradigm? Kennedy may very well be playing the long-game to make America healthier, but is his overall stated goal of increasing confidence in vaccines a clever redirect, if not an obfuscation from real truth? Let's start with the need for vaccines, period. Hell, let's start with the Rockefeller promoted notion of germ theory. Scrutinizing these details will probably bring everyone to the conclusion that there should not be any trust in any vaccines at all because they will be deemed unnecessary.
If you want to argue that there is no such thing as viruses and or bacteria and other pathogens and/or infectious diseases then please be explicit, such as by linking to where such arguments are made to your satisfaction.
Everyday experience and rigorous science has lead most people to conclude that these things are real.
You should also provide links to arguments that detailed studies of viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2 spike protein's structure and complex mechanical behaviour https://www.nature.com/articles/s41580-021-00418-x are either a fraud or part of a massive delusion.
I do not typically entertain anyone such as yourself who uses the authors of, and facilitators of a deceit that has been the greatest cause of harm and death upon the human race since the beginning, to justify the very deceit (who do you think controls what Nature prints). But I do here to provide others with a means of protection from your words. Any critical thought and questioning would have brought you to these authors, and many others who have clearly illustrated the flawed science of germ theory.
https://viroliegy.com/
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=1105864&post_id=166040924&utm_source=post-email-title&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1k5g7b&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo5NDMxMjc3NSwicG9zdF9pZCI6MTY2MDQwOTI0LCJpYXQiOjE3NTAxNDczNzEsImV4cCI6MTc1MjczOTM3MSwiaXNzIjoicHViLTExMDU4NjQiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.-1Xqi8RAO6ZMHSXAM6xc4U0guP6KoZhRW_tWsfGSv7E
Maybe I've worked in the legal world too long. But speaking as an editor, I see no basis for your use of "bar" here. I think "approach" would be more appropriate.
I continue to really appreciate the clarity of your writing, and your efforts to systematize the progress being made.
Thumbs down for Bobby.
This makes sense - show, transparently, Why the mRNA products are impossible to make safe. (Then again there are at least thousands of studies that already do this .... but if the public is able to see them scrutinized in a new administration and they are removed because they don't meet common sense regulations ... that would be great)
What worries me are the many forces that stacked against Kennedy from doing what he wants to do ... I voted Against whatever puppets Harris, that mandated those awful shots (they're Still mandated for healthcare workers), and I voted, with hope and trust, For two people whose names weren't on the ballot but I hoped would be part of the administration - Kennedy and Tulsi Gabbard.
Seems like now that the empire / neocons agenda is at odds with what Tulsi wants - peace and not WW3 - she's being sidelined. "I don't care what she thinks", Trump said. Pharma is as evil and bloodthirsty for expansion as the neocons, just inside all of our bodies, instead of all over the map. I hope and pray Kennedy is able to accomplish his goals.
I do believe you too are a Treeper. Good info about Tulsi at that site.
I took a peek at BlueSky and saw this - https://peoplescdc.substack.com/ // https://peoplescdc.org/
They're outraged about Kennedy causing "lack of vaccine access", and certain the science on safe and effective is obvious.
https://peoplescdc.org/safer-gatherings/
I actually consider covid to be a beast of a disease that I'll always take some precautions for, but being injected with instructions to make spike protein is surely not one of them.
If there are any honest people among this site (the account at Bluesky who shared it Is a good soul who truly believes all this), could they ever process that HCQ and Ivermectin worked all along?
They were initially funded by a Robert Wood Johnson grant, and now say they're just funded by donations. There are still a lot of honest people who can't comprehend how deep the official narrative has lied ...
Great explanation and a great stab in the fraud of vaccine safety. One quibble though:
"Journalists like yourself assume that vaccines are encountering the same kind of rigorous safety testing as other drugs, including multiyear double-blind placebo testing. But the fact is that vaccines don’t."
As RELATIVELY thorough as testing for other drugs is, that testing is also fraught with fraud.
Indeed. That's for another chapter.
I can understand that implementing the "Kennedy Bar" will take some time.
But in the interim, FDA approvals must be BARRED. The fools Makary and Prasad are killing people approving mNEXSPIKE, mRESVIA, menQuadfi and other poisons.