We saw his decisions. We raised concerns, issued warnings, and watched them go unheeded. Marks answered not to science, but to those who saw objectivity as optional. The tone-deafness remains obvious.
Another rat squirming to get off of the sinking ship. More than anything else I just want the truth to be seen by all of how we were brainwashed by unscrupulous characters who were bribed or blackmailed to enforce this most atrocious crime against humanity.
Yes, there were many who were bribed and blackmailed, but there were also many who were not brainwashed, who like myself are deficient in respect for authority, and trust in the "experts."
They are hiding completely the number that now know and have their guard up on many topics. Speaking of ships, I had a rare and vivid dream of a stream of those old clipper ships coming down a river and the mountains in the background opened up a huge crevice. The ships flowed up into the crevice and sank into the mountain and it closed over them. I'd say that is a great premonition. Since we're all considered to be controlled by our "birth" certificate maritime owners, I can't help but see the symbolism.
I refuse to read the entire, nauseating missive Marks penned to essentially blame RFK jr's 'misinformation' for his own avoidance of accountability. the fact that tax payer funded health/medical data arrived redacted is the biggest 'tell' that nobody in the media or public bothered to question. we were just expected to accept it as 'business as usual'.
like you Dr Jack, have watched the man's tenure at the FDA as one, continuous butt-kiss to Big Pharma. shall we start a countdown clock for his move to a 7-figure job with one of the big corporations? or will the man see the writing on the wall and actually wait a few months and hope we all will move on and not notice. sorry Peter, WE'LL NOTICE.
I appreciate this analysis of Marks's inactions grounded in scientific inquiry and data. I am however unclear when I will stop rolling my eyes after reading"peer reviewed." That phrase has been so watered down...I am hopeful the bar will go back up on it though.
When RIchard Nixon resigned the Presidency, he was told by Kissinger "history will treat you very well." Nixon replied "it depends on who writes the history." Same with peer review. An article may be "peer reviewed", but it depends on who the peer reviewers are.
Does anyone know if this man, Peter Marks, was the person Dr. Soon-Shiong somewhat defended on his interview with Tucker Carlson? It was somewhere in the middle of the interview, and Dr. Soon-Shiong's accent caused me to rewind at the time because I thought he said, "Peter Daszak". Satisfied that it was not Daszak, I allowed myself to dismiss the name as unimportant. I admit to being too lazy to review the interview (fascinating as it was) to find out for sure. Anyone?
A brilliant and outstanding essay, James Lyons-Weiler! Thoroughly enjoyed resting it! The US Public Health sector has a long road ahead to regain the trust of the American people.
In addition to high PCR cycle times, it appears that influenza was not added to the PCR Covid test reference panel until the summer of 2021, and so one would have had to run both Covid PCR tests as well as influenza tests to make an influenza diagnosis from 2020 until summer 2021. At the same time, the medical-industrial-complex was incentivized to diagnose Covid. Meanwhile, the incidence of influenza cases in the same period appears to have fallen. But maybe I have it all wrong ?
It must be said loud and clear. Peter Marks has death, suffering and misery forever tied to his name for being one of the many clogs in a criminal cabal that perpetrated the whole Covid scam. Call it for what it is - a genocide far worse than any other throughout all of human history. May the souls of all who were part of it rot in hell for eternity.
Baffling; how can the FPR when the proportion of truly negative tested samples testing positive be low, when most positive FDR yield an FDR exceeding 50%? Do I fail to parse this correctly? What does "low" mean? No more than 50%? Swallowing camels while straining at gnats? So far, this looks like a distinction without a difference. Do you demand "discovering" a 50% infection rate in an entirely uninfected population?
I "Remember Ivermectin"; Elon Musk still bans me as "advocating suicide" because I insisted it have legitimate human use.
Another rat squirming to get off of the sinking ship. More than anything else I just want the truth to be seen by all of how we were brainwashed by unscrupulous characters who were bribed or blackmailed to enforce this most atrocious crime against humanity.
Yes, there were many who were bribed and blackmailed, but there were also many who were not brainwashed, who like myself are deficient in respect for authority, and trust in the "experts."
They are hiding completely the number that now know and have their guard up on many topics. Speaking of ships, I had a rare and vivid dream of a stream of those old clipper ships coming down a river and the mountains in the background opened up a huge crevice. The ships flowed up into the crevice and sank into the mountain and it closed over them. I'd say that is a great premonition. Since we're all considered to be controlled by our "birth" certificate maritime owners, I can't help but see the symbolism.
I refuse to read the entire, nauseating missive Marks penned to essentially blame RFK jr's 'misinformation' for his own avoidance of accountability. the fact that tax payer funded health/medical data arrived redacted is the biggest 'tell' that nobody in the media or public bothered to question. we were just expected to accept it as 'business as usual'.
like you Dr Jack, have watched the man's tenure at the FDA as one, continuous butt-kiss to Big Pharma. shall we start a countdown clock for his move to a 7-figure job with one of the big corporations? or will the man see the writing on the wall and actually wait a few months and hope we all will move on and not notice. sorry Peter, WE'LL NOTICE.
I appreciate this analysis of Marks's inactions grounded in scientific inquiry and data. I am however unclear when I will stop rolling my eyes after reading"peer reviewed." That phrase has been so watered down...I am hopeful the bar will go back up on it though.
When RIchard Nixon resigned the Presidency, he was told by Kissinger "history will treat you very well." Nixon replied "it depends on who writes the history." Same with peer review. An article may be "peer reviewed", but it depends on who the peer reviewers are.
Does anyone know if this man, Peter Marks, was the person Dr. Soon-Shiong somewhat defended on his interview with Tucker Carlson? It was somewhere in the middle of the interview, and Dr. Soon-Shiong's accent caused me to rewind at the time because I thought he said, "Peter Daszak". Satisfied that it was not Daszak, I allowed myself to dismiss the name as unimportant. I admit to being too lazy to review the interview (fascinating as it was) to find out for sure. Anyone?
I witnessed moms and babies being separated 10 days for asymptomatic false positive PCR.
Marks should lose his medical license and do time in prison.
A brilliant and outstanding essay, James Lyons-Weiler! Thoroughly enjoyed resting it! The US Public Health sector has a long road ahead to regain the trust of the American people.
In addition to high PCR cycle times, it appears that influenza was not added to the PCR Covid test reference panel until the summer of 2021, and so one would have had to run both Covid PCR tests as well as influenza tests to make an influenza diagnosis from 2020 until summer 2021. At the same time, the medical-industrial-complex was incentivized to diagnose Covid. Meanwhile, the incidence of influenza cases in the same period appears to have fallen. But maybe I have it all wrong ?
I personally hold them the first ones to be accountable for my sister's death. If only they could be charged with murder in the first degree.
A life sentence would not be sufficient punishment for this man's evil ways.
I'm sure Peter Marks' final excuse will be, "but I was just following orders". A familiar excuse indeed.
It must be said loud and clear. Peter Marks has death, suffering and misery forever tied to his name for being one of the many clogs in a criminal cabal that perpetrated the whole Covid scam. Call it for what it is - a genocide far worse than any other throughout all of human history. May the souls of all who were part of it rot in hell for eternity.
Baffling; how can the FPR when the proportion of truly negative tested samples testing positive be low, when most positive FDR yield an FDR exceeding 50%? Do I fail to parse this correctly? What does "low" mean? No more than 50%? Swallowing camels while straining at gnats? So far, this looks like a distinction without a difference. Do you demand "discovering" a 50% infection rate in an entirely uninfected population?
I "Remember Ivermectin"; Elon Musk still bans me as "advocating suicide" because I insisted it have legitimate human use.
Great career sketch of a disgraced FDA/Pharma apparatchik. Good riddance.