These are important changes but I remain utterly baffled that yet another mRNA vaccine is approved and that the self-replicating RNA shot is being fast-tracked. James, could you explain it to me, I just can't wrap my mind around something as irresponsible as a self-replicating RNA being promoted. What's the urgency in introducing this new untested technology? How do you turn it off if it keeps replicating? What prevents it from being transmitted to other people via exhaled exosomes? That's taking big chances with our health.
To take your question further Marc, Since the synthetic mRNA spike is being found in autopsies 2 years after the most recently received injection, how do we know the current and original mRNA injectable products do not self replicate?
Normally credentials are cited in an attempt to back up claims of knowledge, rather than to back up a lack of knowledge qualifying one to pose a question. And it seems to me that lack of knowledge would BE the most valid qualification for posing a question and wouldn't normally demand any kind of backing up. And even if such a request for credentials made sense, credentials really don't provide any kind of certitude even IF they prove to be real and legitimate.
If there is, ultimately, validity to the apparent implication that it was a foolish question for Red-Pilled ER Nurse to pose, wouldn't the direct and honest path be to explicitly make that claim, and then explain why it's a foolish question? Is there some reason you avoided doing that?
Hi Lauri, I am open to courteous counterpoints to anything I have said. If you have some solid information you would like to share, by all means do so. But I just want to say that being mean to people you do not know, right out of the gate and stopping there is not usually a productive way to engage someone in meaningful dialogue.
I don’t know you. You may be a decent person, but I will never find that out if all I have to go on is the first impression you have given me.
I doubt you have any actual interest in my credentials or experience. Just my hunch. All the same, here is a small sampling of the damage I have seen in people I know.
Next, please get rid of the Brighton Collaboration causality assessment. It uses circular reasoning and not probabilistic assessment like for drugs. Vaccine causality assessment used Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) criteria back in 2000 so they were able to remove the rota virus vaccine quickly. Today that vaccine would still be on the schedule.
I’m hopeful that the new ACIP members will be people with deep understandings of epidemiology and immunology from various disciplines, no financial conflicts of interest, and the willingness to be completely transparent and debate the issues publicly.
Is it too much to ask for an end to the Covid Emergency Declaration, and to mandated vaccine compliance as a requirement for children to receive the education which is their right?
Pack your sh$t and be sure to let the office door wack you on the way out. move it! and leave the stationary… go get a job fudging data for Pfizer or whatever snake-oil you happen to rubber stamped during your tenure of wasting tax payer money.
The kid gets the quackzine fever then gets the NSAID then - WOOSH - mush brain. Like a binary weapon.
Everybody knows that the kid is out of the womb only because the pelvis is too narrow; the baby brain is still undergoing embryogenesis until puberty. So this idea to inject heavy metals while artificially inducing a fever & throwing in a potentially organ-devouring prostaglandin inhibitor is totally crazy - if not criminally insane - take your pick.
quackzine + NSAID = varying degrees of mush brain
The reason that still fresh, week-old, still blind kittens are not used for ‘safety & efficacy’ research is not because the Faucis are cat-lovers…
Finally! "We can neither confirm nor Deny" Is no longer acceptable! It is used so frequently in various Realms. We need to work on the Courts now...
Especially when they use "not enough evidence to confirm nor deny" as proof against causality.
Is there a way to apply to become a member of the ACIP?
https://www.cdc.gov/acip/apply-for-membership/index.html
These are important changes but I remain utterly baffled that yet another mRNA vaccine is approved and that the self-replicating RNA shot is being fast-tracked. James, could you explain it to me, I just can't wrap my mind around something as irresponsible as a self-replicating RNA being promoted. What's the urgency in introducing this new untested technology? How do you turn it off if it keeps replicating? What prevents it from being transmitted to other people via exhaled exosomes? That's taking big chances with our health.
To take your question further Marc, Since the synthetic mRNA spike is being found in autopsies 2 years after the most recently received injection, how do we know the current and original mRNA injectable products do not self replicate?
Besides being an RN, what credentials do you have that back up your lack of knowledge regarding mRNA vaccines?
Normally credentials are cited in an attempt to back up claims of knowledge, rather than to back up a lack of knowledge qualifying one to pose a question. And it seems to me that lack of knowledge would BE the most valid qualification for posing a question and wouldn't normally demand any kind of backing up. And even if such a request for credentials made sense, credentials really don't provide any kind of certitude even IF they prove to be real and legitimate.
If there is, ultimately, validity to the apparent implication that it was a foolish question for Red-Pilled ER Nurse to pose, wouldn't the direct and honest path be to explicitly make that claim, and then explain why it's a foolish question? Is there some reason you avoided doing that?
That was lovely
Hi Lauri, I am open to courteous counterpoints to anything I have said. If you have some solid information you would like to share, by all means do so. But I just want to say that being mean to people you do not know, right out of the gate and stopping there is not usually a productive way to engage someone in meaningful dialogue.
I don’t know you. You may be a decent person, but I will never find that out if all I have to go on is the first impression you have given me.
I doubt you have any actual interest in my credentials or experience. Just my hunch. All the same, here is a small sampling of the damage I have seen in people I know.
https://open.substack.com/pub/redpilledernurse/p/so-this-happened?r=1blped&utm_medium=ios
If you are interested in polite discussion let me know. You may have information I have not considered.
But if you only want to throw barbs from behind a screen of anonymity I have other things to do with my time.
May God bless you with health and happiness.
Hi,
I would love to have decent and respectful dialogue. You might be surprised that we have common ground 😁
If it sheds, then everyone will be harmed. I think getting rid of the CDC charlatans, will solve this problem.
Next, please get rid of the Brighton Collaboration causality assessment. It uses circular reasoning and not probabilistic assessment like for drugs. Vaccine causality assessment used Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) criteria back in 2000 so they were able to remove the rota virus vaccine quickly. Today that vaccine would still be on the schedule.
Thank goodness! Get rid of all the compromised, corrupt people on that committee!!
I’m hopeful that the new ACIP members will be people with deep understandings of epidemiology and immunology from various disciplines, no financial conflicts of interest, and the willingness to be completely transparent and debate the issues publicly.
Is it too much to ask for an end to the Covid Emergency Declaration, and to mandated vaccine compliance as a requirement for children to receive the education which is their right?
Pack your sh$t and be sure to let the office door wack you on the way out. move it! and leave the stationary… go get a job fudging data for Pfizer or whatever snake-oil you happen to rubber stamped during your tenure of wasting tax payer money.
Is this not the committee from which two ethical people resigned, rather than rubber-stamp the mRNA Covid vax?
Yes, I wish his critics thought more deeply before complaining on their podcasts.
Dr. Jack, you say that FDA safety evaluations frequently rely on manufacturer-sponsored studies.
Instead of frequently, isn't it exclusively (or at least almost exclusively)?
The kid gets the quackzine fever then gets the NSAID then - WOOSH - mush brain. Like a binary weapon.
Everybody knows that the kid is out of the womb only because the pelvis is too narrow; the baby brain is still undergoing embryogenesis until puberty. So this idea to inject heavy metals while artificially inducing a fever & throwing in a potentially organ-devouring prostaglandin inhibitor is totally crazy - if not criminally insane - take your pick.
quackzine + NSAID = varying degrees of mush brain
The reason that still fresh, week-old, still blind kittens are not used for ‘safety & efficacy’ research is not because the Faucis are cat-lovers…